ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA

Many cases of narcotics have gone through controversies or controversial court decisions. That is, the application of norms in the contents of the court decision is still debatable. One example is the Bandung District Court Decision on behalf of the defendant Nana als Ujang Fata Bin Ajuk Marjuki (Al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasudungan Sinaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM 2023-01-01
Series:IBLAM Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/233
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846129640335212544
author Hasudungan Sinaga
author_facet Hasudungan Sinaga
author_sort Hasudungan Sinaga
collection DOAJ
description Many cases of narcotics have gone through controversies or controversial court decisions. That is, the application of norms in the contents of the court decision is still debatable. One example is the Bandung District Court Decision on behalf of the defendant Nana als Ujang Fata Bin Ajuk Marjuki (Alm) No. 1159/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg regarding the case of the crime of Narcotics. This type of legal research is normative legal research. The nature of the research in this study is analytical descriptive in nature. The type of data used in this research is library research. The circulation of narcotics in Indonesia when viewed from a juridical aspect is legal, the Narcotics Law only prohibits the use of narcotics without permission by the law in question. Narcotics crime is used as a promising and rapidly developing business arena, where this activity has an impact on mental damage, both physically and psychologically, to drug users, especially the younger generation. Law enforcement against narcotics crimes has been carried out by many law enforcement officers and has received many judge's decisions. In the non-juridical aspect, in making his decision, in addition to considering matters of a juridical nature, judges also make non-juridical considerations, especially in terms of economic, social and political aspects. directly or indirectly, either implicitly or explicitly, the "integrative philosophy of punishment" in the judge's decision is not solely based on, starting from and only considering the juridical aspect (formal legalistic) solely because if this starting point does not reflect the values the value of justice that should be embodied by the criminal justice system. Some of the legal issues analyzed from the decision are the Complete Format of the Decision but the exploration of non-juridical aspects is not explored in depth in the decision and the aggravating and mitigating reasons for the crime are not explored in depth and the Articles of Indictment are appropriate but do not formulate articles 55 of the Criminal Code regarding inclusion. The need for the formulation of an article regarding inclusion in the indictment of charges and decisions is due to broaden the criminal responsibility of other actors and to facilitate proof for other cases related to case number: No. 1159/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg. Because from the position of the case it is still possible that there are other actors on the DPO (People Wanted List).
format Article
id doaj-art-d4d9a7165c16452d973731b7d3ea58d7
institution Kabale University
issn 2775-4146
2775-3174
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM
record_format Article
series IBLAM Law Review
spelling doaj-art-d4d9a7165c16452d973731b7d3ea58d72024-12-10T02:04:44ZengSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAMIBLAM Law Review2775-41462775-31742023-01-013110.52249/ilr.v3i1.233ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA Hasudungan Sinaga0Universitas Tama JagakarsaMany cases of narcotics have gone through controversies or controversial court decisions. That is, the application of norms in the contents of the court decision is still debatable. One example is the Bandung District Court Decision on behalf of the defendant Nana als Ujang Fata Bin Ajuk Marjuki (Alm) No. 1159/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg regarding the case of the crime of Narcotics. This type of legal research is normative legal research. The nature of the research in this study is analytical descriptive in nature. The type of data used in this research is library research. The circulation of narcotics in Indonesia when viewed from a juridical aspect is legal, the Narcotics Law only prohibits the use of narcotics without permission by the law in question. Narcotics crime is used as a promising and rapidly developing business arena, where this activity has an impact on mental damage, both physically and psychologically, to drug users, especially the younger generation. Law enforcement against narcotics crimes has been carried out by many law enforcement officers and has received many judge's decisions. In the non-juridical aspect, in making his decision, in addition to considering matters of a juridical nature, judges also make non-juridical considerations, especially in terms of economic, social and political aspects. directly or indirectly, either implicitly or explicitly, the "integrative philosophy of punishment" in the judge's decision is not solely based on, starting from and only considering the juridical aspect (formal legalistic) solely because if this starting point does not reflect the values the value of justice that should be embodied by the criminal justice system. Some of the legal issues analyzed from the decision are the Complete Format of the Decision but the exploration of non-juridical aspects is not explored in depth in the decision and the aggravating and mitigating reasons for the crime are not explored in depth and the Articles of Indictment are appropriate but do not formulate articles 55 of the Criminal Code regarding inclusion. The need for the formulation of an article regarding inclusion in the indictment of charges and decisions is due to broaden the criminal responsibility of other actors and to facilitate proof for other cases related to case number: No. 1159/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg. Because from the position of the case it is still possible that there are other actors on the DPO (People Wanted List). https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/233CriminalDisctrict CourtNarcotics
spellingShingle Hasudungan Sinaga
ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
IBLAM Law Review
Criminal
Disctrict Court
Narcotics
title ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
title_full ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
title_fullStr ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
title_full_unstemmed ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
title_short ANALISIS ASPEK YURIDIS DAN ASPEK NON YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENJADI PERANTARA DALAM JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA
title_sort analisis aspek yuridis dan aspek non yuridis terhadap tindak pidana menjadi perantara dalam jual beli narkotika
topic Criminal
Disctrict Court
Narcotics
url https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/233
work_keys_str_mv AT hasudungansinaga analisisaspekyuridisdanaspeknonyuridisterhadaptindakpidanamenjadiperantaradalamjualbelinarkotika