Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review
Background Robots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038650.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841554124714278912 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin Mueller Ricarda Servaty Annalena Kersten Kirsten Brukamp Ralph Möhler |
| author_facet | Martin Mueller Ricarda Servaty Annalena Kersten Kirsten Brukamp Ralph Möhler |
| author_sort | Martin Mueller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background Robots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.Methods Articles published from 2002 to 2019 reporting on projects to implement robotic devices in nursing care were searched on Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and databases on funded research projects (Community Research and Development Information Services and Technische Informationsbibliothek) and in journals for robotic research in November 2017 and July 2019 for an update. No restrictions regarding study designs were imposed. All included articles underwent quality assessments with design-specific critical appraisal tools. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were classified using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework.Results After removing all duplicates, the search revealed 11 204 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. The majority of the studies dealt with the implementation of robots designed to support individuals, either living at home or in nursing homes (n=11). The studies were conducted in Europe, the USA and New Zealand and were carried out in nursing homes, individual living environments, hospital units and laboratories. The quality of reporting and quality of evidence were low in most studies. The most frequently reported barriers were in socioeconomic and ethical domains and were within the implementation outcomes domain. The most frequently reported facilitators were related to the sociocultural context, implementation process and implementation strategies.Discussion This review identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic devices in nursing within different dimensions. The results serve as a basis for the development of suitable implementation strategies to reduce potential barriers and promote the integration of elements to facilitate implementation.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018073486. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d48b7d69eb5640baa47b86b60a00236d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-d48b7d69eb5640baa47b86b60a00236d2025-01-08T22:50:11ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2020-038650Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative reviewMartin Mueller0Ricarda Servaty1Annalena Kersten2Kirsten Brukamp3Ralph Möhler4Faculty of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Rosenheim, GermanyFaculty of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Rosenheim, GermanyProtestant University of Applied Sciences, Ludwigsburg, GermanyProtestant University of Applied Sciences, Ludwigsburg, GermanySchool of Public Health, Universitat Bielefeld, Bielefeld, GermanyBackground Robots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.Methods Articles published from 2002 to 2019 reporting on projects to implement robotic devices in nursing care were searched on Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and databases on funded research projects (Community Research and Development Information Services and Technische Informationsbibliothek) and in journals for robotic research in November 2017 and July 2019 for an update. No restrictions regarding study designs were imposed. All included articles underwent quality assessments with design-specific critical appraisal tools. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were classified using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework.Results After removing all duplicates, the search revealed 11 204 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. The majority of the studies dealt with the implementation of robots designed to support individuals, either living at home or in nursing homes (n=11). The studies were conducted in Europe, the USA and New Zealand and were carried out in nursing homes, individual living environments, hospital units and laboratories. The quality of reporting and quality of evidence were low in most studies. The most frequently reported barriers were in socioeconomic and ethical domains and were within the implementation outcomes domain. The most frequently reported facilitators were related to the sociocultural context, implementation process and implementation strategies.Discussion This review identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic devices in nursing within different dimensions. The results serve as a basis for the development of suitable implementation strategies to reduce potential barriers and promote the integration of elements to facilitate implementation.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018073486.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038650.full |
| spellingShingle | Martin Mueller Ricarda Servaty Annalena Kersten Kirsten Brukamp Ralph Möhler Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review BMJ Open |
| title | Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review |
| title_full | Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review |
| title_fullStr | Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review |
| title_short | Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review |
| title_sort | implementation of robotic devices in nursing care barriers and facilitators an integrative review |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038650.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martinmueller implementationofroboticdevicesinnursingcarebarriersandfacilitatorsanintegrativereview AT ricardaservaty implementationofroboticdevicesinnursingcarebarriersandfacilitatorsanintegrativereview AT annalenakersten implementationofroboticdevicesinnursingcarebarriersandfacilitatorsanintegrativereview AT kirstenbrukamp implementationofroboticdevicesinnursingcarebarriersandfacilitatorsanintegrativereview AT ralphmohler implementationofroboticdevicesinnursingcarebarriersandfacilitatorsanintegrativereview |