To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris

<p>Modeling atmospheric composition at street level is challenging because pollutant concentrations within street canyons depend on both local emissions and the transport of polluted air masses from remote areas. Therefore, regional-scale modeling and local applications must be combined to pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Squarcioni, Y. Roustan, M. Valari, Y. Kim, K. Sartelet, L. Lugon, F. Dugay, R. Voitot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/93/2025/acp-25-93-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556384746831872
author A. Squarcioni
A. Squarcioni
Y. Roustan
M. Valari
Y. Kim
K. Sartelet
L. Lugon
F. Dugay
R. Voitot
author_facet A. Squarcioni
A. Squarcioni
Y. Roustan
M. Valari
Y. Kim
K. Sartelet
L. Lugon
F. Dugay
R. Voitot
author_sort A. Squarcioni
collection DOAJ
description <p>Modeling atmospheric composition at street level is challenging because pollutant concentrations within street canyons depend on both local emissions and the transport of polluted air masses from remote areas. Therefore, regional-scale modeling and local applications must be combined to provide accurate simulations of the atmospheric composition at street locations. In our study, we compare two strategies: (i) a subgrid-scale approach embedded in the chemistry–transport model (denoted Subgrid) and (ii) the street-network model MUNICH (Model of Urban Network of Intersecting Canyons and Highways). In both cases, the regional-scale chemistry–transport model CHIMERE provides the urban background concentrations, and the meteorological model Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), coupled with CHIMERE, is used to provide meteorological fields. Simulation results for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub><i>x</i></sub></span>, NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>, and PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> concentrations over the city of Paris from both modeling approaches are compared with in situ measurements from traffic air quality stations. At stations located in downtown areas, with low traffic emissions, the street-network model MUNICH exhibits superior performance compared to the Subgrid approach for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub><i>x</i></sub></span> concentrations, while comparable results are obtained for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>. However, significant discrepancies between the two methods are observed for all analyzed pollutants at stations heavily influenced by road traffic. These stations are typically located near highways, where the difference between the two approaches can reach 58 %. The ability of the Subgrid approach to estimate accurate emission data is limited, leading to potential underestimation or overestimation of gas and fine-particle concentrations based on the emission heterogeneity it handles. The performance of MUNICH appears to be highly sensitive to the friction velocity, a parameter influenced by the anthropogenic heat flux used in the WRF model. Street dimensions do contribute to the performance disparities observed between the two approaches, yet emissions remain the predominant factor.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-d3fc49f87b0942dd903e374a05bc4e12
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj-art-d3fc49f87b0942dd903e374a05bc4e122025-01-07T09:35:21ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242025-01-01259311710.5194/acp-25-93-2025To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over ParisA. Squarcioni0A. Squarcioni1Y. Roustan2M. Valari3Y. Kim4K. Sartelet5L. Lugon6F. Dugay7R. Voitot8CEREA, École des Ponts, EDF R&D, Marne-la-Vallée, FranceLaboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Sorbonne Université, École Polytechnique, IPSL, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Paris, FranceCEREA, École des Ponts, EDF R&D, Marne-la-Vallée, FranceLaboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Sorbonne Université, École Polytechnique, IPSL, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Paris, FranceCEREA, École des Ponts, EDF R&D, Marne-la-Vallée, FranceCEREA, École des Ponts, EDF R&D, Marne-la-Vallée, FranceCEREA, École des Ponts, EDF R&D, Marne-la-Vallée, FranceAirparif, 75004, Paris, FranceAirparif, 75004, Paris, France<p>Modeling atmospheric composition at street level is challenging because pollutant concentrations within street canyons depend on both local emissions and the transport of polluted air masses from remote areas. Therefore, regional-scale modeling and local applications must be combined to provide accurate simulations of the atmospheric composition at street locations. In our study, we compare two strategies: (i) a subgrid-scale approach embedded in the chemistry–transport model (denoted Subgrid) and (ii) the street-network model MUNICH (Model of Urban Network of Intersecting Canyons and Highways). In both cases, the regional-scale chemistry–transport model CHIMERE provides the urban background concentrations, and the meteorological model Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), coupled with CHIMERE, is used to provide meteorological fields. Simulation results for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub><i>x</i></sub></span>, NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>, and PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> concentrations over the city of Paris from both modeling approaches are compared with in situ measurements from traffic air quality stations. At stations located in downtown areas, with low traffic emissions, the street-network model MUNICH exhibits superior performance compared to the Subgrid approach for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub><i>x</i></sub></span> concentrations, while comparable results are obtained for NO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>. However, significant discrepancies between the two methods are observed for all analyzed pollutants at stations heavily influenced by road traffic. These stations are typically located near highways, where the difference between the two approaches can reach 58 %. The ability of the Subgrid approach to estimate accurate emission data is limited, leading to potential underestimation or overestimation of gas and fine-particle concentrations based on the emission heterogeneity it handles. The performance of MUNICH appears to be highly sensitive to the friction velocity, a parameter influenced by the anthropogenic heat flux used in the WRF model. Street dimensions do contribute to the performance disparities observed between the two approaches, yet emissions remain the predominant factor.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/93/2025/acp-25-93-2025.pdf
spellingShingle A. Squarcioni
A. Squarcioni
Y. Roustan
M. Valari
Y. Kim
K. Sartelet
L. Lugon
F. Dugay
R. Voitot
To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
title_full To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
title_fullStr To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
title_full_unstemmed To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
title_short To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality: a case study over Paris
title_sort to what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air quality a case study over paris
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/93/2025/acp-25-93-2025.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT asquarcioni towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT asquarcioni towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT yroustan towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT mvalari towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT ykim towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT ksartelet towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT llugon towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT fdugay towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis
AT rvoitot towhatextentisthedescriptionofstreetsimportantinestimatinglocalairqualityacasestudyoverparis