The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study
The aim of the present prospective, randomized study was to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in providing sedation for gastroscopy. A total of 50 adult patients (25 patients receiving dexmedetomidine and 25 patients receiving midazolam), 18 to 60 ye...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Yavuz Demiraran, Esin Korkut, Ali Tamer, Ilknur Yorulmaz, Buket Kocaman, Gulbin Sezen, Yusuf Akcan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/350279 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Midazolam During Sedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
by: Ryoji Ichijima, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nasal Sedation Midazolam Compared with Dexmedetomidine in the Management of Uncooperative Children with Down Syndrome during Dental Treatment
by: Mohamad Nabil Hamod, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Study on the sedative effect and safety of oral midazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in children during magnetic resonance imaging examination
by: Yuancui Li, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Persistent Paradoxical Reaction to Midazolam despite General Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine
by: Sarah Park, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Comparison of the effects and side-effects of sedation with propofol versus midazolam plus pethidine in patients undergoing endoscopy in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz
by: Eskandar Hajiani, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)