The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.

In accordance with ancient Egyptian beliefs, the preservation of the body after death was an important prerequisite for the continued existence of the deceased in the afterlife. This involved application of various physical interventions and magical rituals to the corpse. Computed tomography (CT), a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Zesch, Stephanie Panzer, Alice Paladin, M Linda Sutherland, Susanne Lindauer, Ronny Friedrich, Tanja Pommerening, Albert Zink, Wilfried Rosendahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316018
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555490317795328
author Stephanie Zesch
Stephanie Panzer
Alice Paladin
M Linda Sutherland
Susanne Lindauer
Ronny Friedrich
Tanja Pommerening
Albert Zink
Wilfried Rosendahl
author_facet Stephanie Zesch
Stephanie Panzer
Alice Paladin
M Linda Sutherland
Susanne Lindauer
Ronny Friedrich
Tanja Pommerening
Albert Zink
Wilfried Rosendahl
author_sort Stephanie Zesch
collection DOAJ
description In accordance with ancient Egyptian beliefs, the preservation of the body after death was an important prerequisite for the continued existence of the deceased in the afterlife. This involved application of various physical interventions and magical rituals to the corpse. Computed tomography (CT), as the gold-standard technology in the field of paleoradiology, enables deeper insights into details of artificial body preservation. Therefore, CT was applied to investigate age at death, sex, mummification techniques, and the state of soft tissue preservation in 21 child mummies. The specimens are housed in European museums and were found in various archaeological sites. This sample included 12 males, 7 females, and two specimens of unknown sex, all between the ages of one and 14 years. Time periods were determined by radiocarbon dating, and time-related indicators of funerary equipment and decoration. Most of the mummies date from the Late Period to the Roman Period (664 BC-395 AD). Differences were identified concerning techniques of wrapping and embalming and removal of brain and internal organs, depending on age at death, social status and the archaeological site of the individuals. The variety and multifaceted nature of mummification and soft tissue preservation was analyzed in an integrated approach including a large number of specimens. The study highlights the significance of subadult remains as valuable bioarcheological archives to investigate burial customs and religious concepts in past societies.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3a32c34c07d4acc8c1ef212b6aa3ac9
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-d3a32c34c07d4acc8c1ef212b6aa3ac92025-01-08T05:32:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031601810.1371/journal.pone.0316018The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.Stephanie ZeschStephanie PanzerAlice PaladinM Linda SutherlandSusanne LindauerRonny FriedrichTanja PommereningAlbert ZinkWilfried RosendahlIn accordance with ancient Egyptian beliefs, the preservation of the body after death was an important prerequisite for the continued existence of the deceased in the afterlife. This involved application of various physical interventions and magical rituals to the corpse. Computed tomography (CT), as the gold-standard technology in the field of paleoradiology, enables deeper insights into details of artificial body preservation. Therefore, CT was applied to investigate age at death, sex, mummification techniques, and the state of soft tissue preservation in 21 child mummies. The specimens are housed in European museums and were found in various archaeological sites. This sample included 12 males, 7 females, and two specimens of unknown sex, all between the ages of one and 14 years. Time periods were determined by radiocarbon dating, and time-related indicators of funerary equipment and decoration. Most of the mummies date from the Late Period to the Roman Period (664 BC-395 AD). Differences were identified concerning techniques of wrapping and embalming and removal of brain and internal organs, depending on age at death, social status and the archaeological site of the individuals. The variety and multifaceted nature of mummification and soft tissue preservation was analyzed in an integrated approach including a large number of specimens. The study highlights the significance of subadult remains as valuable bioarcheological archives to investigate burial customs and religious concepts in past societies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316018
spellingShingle Stephanie Zesch
Stephanie Panzer
Alice Paladin
M Linda Sutherland
Susanne Lindauer
Ronny Friedrich
Tanja Pommerening
Albert Zink
Wilfried Rosendahl
The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
PLoS ONE
title The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
title_full The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
title_fullStr The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
title_full_unstemmed The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
title_short The multifaceted nature of Egyptian mummification: Paleoradiological insights into child mummies.
title_sort multifaceted nature of egyptian mummification paleoradiological insights into child mummies
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316018
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniezesch themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT stephaniepanzer themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT alicepaladin themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT mlindasutherland themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT susannelindauer themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT ronnyfriedrich themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT tanjapommerening themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT albertzink themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT wilfriedrosendahl themultifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT stephaniezesch multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT stephaniepanzer multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT alicepaladin multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT mlindasutherland multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT susannelindauer multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT ronnyfriedrich multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT tanjapommerening multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT albertzink multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies
AT wilfriedrosendahl multifacetednatureofegyptianmummificationpaleoradiologicalinsightsintochildmummies