The role of emergency medicine specialists and general practitioners in yellow zone patient management: A case in the Sakarya Province
Abstract Background Emergency departments in Turkey employ both emergency medicine specialists (EMSs) and general practitioners due to an insufficient number of EMSs. Patients are triaged into green, yellow, and red codes based on urgency. Typically, EMSs manage more critical patients (yellow and re...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12055 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Background Emergency departments in Turkey employ both emergency medicine specialists (EMSs) and general practitioners due to an insufficient number of EMSs. Patients are triaged into green, yellow, and red codes based on urgency. Typically, EMSs manage more critical patients (yellow and red codes), while general practitioners handle less urgent cases (green codes). Objective This study investigates differences in patient management approaches between EMSs and general practitioners in the yellow zone of an emergency department in the Sakarya Province. Method This retrospective, cross‐sectional study was conducted at the Sakarya Training and Research Hospital from 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2021. The study included patients aged 18 and older who were assigned to the yellow zone and discharged by the attending physician. Data on patient monitoring times, consultation requests, hospitalization rates, resource utilization, readmission rates, and hospital revenue contributions were collected and analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 21, comparing the performance of EMSs and general practitioners. Result The study included 59 physicians (14 EMSs and 45 general practitioners) and a large number of patients. EMSs had significantly more experience, shorter consultation request times, and higher ICU admission rates. They also ordered fewer MRIs and USGs per patient and made more consultation requests. There was no significant difference between EMSs and general practitioners in terms of the number of examinations, patient observation times, ward hospitalization rates, CT orders, readmission rates, and hospital revenue contributions. Conclusion EMSs demonstrated more efficient use of emergency department resources, effective consultation processes, and higher ICU admission rates, indicating better patient management. Despite the limited scope of this single‐center study, the findings highlight the importance of EMSs in improving emergency care quality. Further research is needed to validate these results across multiple centers. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1024-9079 2309-5407 |