Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study

Abstract Background Limited resources during the COVID-19 pandemic made ICU admission decisions ethically complex. In Sweden, where ICU bed availability per capita is among the lowest in Europe, clinical judgment guided triage decisions, as prognostic scoring systems like the Clinical Frailty Scale...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felix Starlander, Erland Östberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00268-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849235649039695872
author Felix Starlander
Erland Östberg
author_facet Felix Starlander
Erland Östberg
author_sort Felix Starlander
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Limited resources during the COVID-19 pandemic made ICU admission decisions ethically complex. In Sweden, where ICU bed availability per capita is among the lowest in Europe, clinical judgment guided triage decisions, as prognostic scoring systems like the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) were not routinely used. This study aimed to compare patients considered eligible for intensive care with those for whom ICU admission was restricted and to evaluate whether a post hoc assessment of frailty and comorbidity aligned with clinical decision making. Methods This retrospective observational study included 204 COVID-19-positive patients admitted to a Swedish secondary hospital during the first pandemic wave. Patients were categorized as either eligible for intensive care (ICU group) or having a documented ICU admission restriction (ICU restriction group). Electronic medical records were reviewed to assign CFS and ACCI scores, and a combined score was calculated to better reflect overall frailty and comorbidity burden. Results The ICU group had a mean age of 68 years versus 83 years in the ICU restriction group. Of the ICU group, 26 out of 100 patients (26%) were ultimately admitted to intensive care. Median combined CFS + ACCI scores were 5 (IQR 5–6) in the ICU group and 12 (IQR 11–14) in the ICU restriction group; difference in score: 7 (95% CI, 6–8; p < 0.001). The combined score demonstrated clear separation between the groups with minimal overlap: in the ICU group, 95% of patients had a combined score below 8.3, while in the ICU restriction group, 95% of patients had a score above 8.4. Conclusions Marked contrasts in age, frailty, and comorbidity burden distinguished patients eligible for intensive care from those with an ICU admission restriction, reflecting a close correspondence between the prognostic scoring systems and clinical judgment. Integrating the CFS and ACCI into a single combined score sharpened the analysis and may prove useful in future research or as a triage tool, although further validation of this approach is warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-d2ebef8c8d484f72b44d28032bcdd7ad
institution Kabale University
issn 2731-3786
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
spelling doaj-art-d2ebef8c8d484f72b44d28032bcdd7ad2025-08-20T04:02:42ZengBMCJournal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care2731-37862025-08-01511910.1186/s44158-025-00268-5Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational studyFelix Starlander0Erland Östberg1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Västmanland Hospital VästeråsDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Västmanland Hospital VästeråsAbstract Background Limited resources during the COVID-19 pandemic made ICU admission decisions ethically complex. In Sweden, where ICU bed availability per capita is among the lowest in Europe, clinical judgment guided triage decisions, as prognostic scoring systems like the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) were not routinely used. This study aimed to compare patients considered eligible for intensive care with those for whom ICU admission was restricted and to evaluate whether a post hoc assessment of frailty and comorbidity aligned with clinical decision making. Methods This retrospective observational study included 204 COVID-19-positive patients admitted to a Swedish secondary hospital during the first pandemic wave. Patients were categorized as either eligible for intensive care (ICU group) or having a documented ICU admission restriction (ICU restriction group). Electronic medical records were reviewed to assign CFS and ACCI scores, and a combined score was calculated to better reflect overall frailty and comorbidity burden. Results The ICU group had a mean age of 68 years versus 83 years in the ICU restriction group. Of the ICU group, 26 out of 100 patients (26%) were ultimately admitted to intensive care. Median combined CFS + ACCI scores were 5 (IQR 5–6) in the ICU group and 12 (IQR 11–14) in the ICU restriction group; difference in score: 7 (95% CI, 6–8; p < 0.001). The combined score demonstrated clear separation between the groups with minimal overlap: in the ICU group, 95% of patients had a combined score below 8.3, while in the ICU restriction group, 95% of patients had a score above 8.4. Conclusions Marked contrasts in age, frailty, and comorbidity burden distinguished patients eligible for intensive care from those with an ICU admission restriction, reflecting a close correspondence between the prognostic scoring systems and clinical judgment. Integrating the CFS and ACCI into a single combined score sharpened the analysis and may prove useful in future research or as a triage tool, although further validation of this approach is warranted.https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00268-5COVID-19ICU triageClinical Frailty ScaleCharlson Comorbidity IndexResource allocation
spellingShingle Felix Starlander
Erland Östberg
Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
COVID-19
ICU triage
Clinical Frailty Scale
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Resource allocation
title Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
title_full Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
title_short Frailty and comorbidity in COVID-19 patients with and without ICU admission restrictions: a retrospective observational study
title_sort frailty and comorbidity in covid 19 patients with and without icu admission restrictions a retrospective observational study
topic COVID-19
ICU triage
Clinical Frailty Scale
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Resource allocation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00268-5
work_keys_str_mv AT felixstarlander frailtyandcomorbidityincovid19patientswithandwithouticuadmissionrestrictionsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT erlandostberg frailtyandcomorbidityincovid19patientswithandwithouticuadmissionrestrictionsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy