Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023

Abstract Background Cryptosporidiosis is a leading cause of zoonotic illness. We aimed to describe cryptosporidiosis illnesses in Tennessee by species and molecular subtypes, and explore epidemiological risk factors. Methods Cryptosporidium is a reportable condition in Tennessee. Cases are investiga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine M. Thomas, Emma Roth, Christian Mackley, Dalton Ford, Dilani Goonewardene, Dorothy Baynham, William Schaffner, Mary-Margaret A. Fill, Jane Yackley, John R. Dunn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11364-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333656271716352
author Christine M. Thomas
Emma Roth
Christian Mackley
Dalton Ford
Dilani Goonewardene
Dorothy Baynham
William Schaffner
Mary-Margaret A. Fill
Jane Yackley
John R. Dunn
author_facet Christine M. Thomas
Emma Roth
Christian Mackley
Dalton Ford
Dilani Goonewardene
Dorothy Baynham
William Schaffner
Mary-Margaret A. Fill
Jane Yackley
John R. Dunn
author_sort Christine M. Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cryptosporidiosis is a leading cause of zoonotic illness. We aimed to describe cryptosporidiosis illnesses in Tennessee by species and molecular subtypes, and explore epidemiological risk factors. Methods Cryptosporidium is a reportable condition in Tennessee. Cases are investigated and molecular subtyping is performed. Collected data includes patient demographics, risk factors, laboratory results, and Cryptosporidium species and subtype. We described Tennessee residents with cryptosporidiosis during 2018–2023. To explore risk factors, we used binomial probabilities to compare exposure frequencies with the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) Population Survey. Results During 2018–2023, Tennessee recorded 1174 cryptosporidiosis cases. Of those, 282 (24%) had species information and 214 (18%) had genotype information. Of 802 laboratory-confirmed cases without species information, 664 (83%) did not have a specimen submitted for molecular subtyping. Most frequently identified species were C. parvum (n = 183, 65%) and C. hominis (n = 60, 21%) with most frequently identified subtypes being C. parvum subtypes IIaA15G2R1 (n = 80) and IIaA15G2R2 (n = 15), and C. hominis subtype IfA12G1R5 (n = 15). C. felis (n = 8), C. ubiquitum (n = 5), C. meleagridis (n = 3), C. canis (n = 2), and C. deer mouse subtypes (n = 2) were also identified. Rates were higher for C. parvum in rural counties and C. hominis in urban counties. Persons with C. parvum infections more often reported contact with goats, cows, or sheep compared to the population (39% vs. 6%, P <.001). Persons with C. hominis infections more often reported contact with natural (22% vs. 9%, P =.003) and treated (32% vs. 12%, P <.001) water, and having contact with another person with diarrheal illness (28% vs. 15%, P =.013). Conclusions Molecular cryptosporidiosis surveillance can facilitate more detailed understanding of cryptosporidiosis risk factors and prevention measures. To best use this tool, a greater proportion of specimens need to be submitted for molecular subtyping.
format Article
id doaj-art-d2a0d426e15f49c4b4f7afcf1e1abba5
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2334
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-d2a0d426e15f49c4b4f7afcf1e1abba52025-08-20T03:45:47ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342025-08-012511910.1186/s12879-025-11364-wRisk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023Christine M. Thomas0Emma Roth1Christian Mackley2Dalton Ford3Dilani Goonewardene4Dorothy Baynham5William Schaffner6Mary-Margaret A. Fill7Jane Yackley8John R. Dunn9Division of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Laboratory Services, Tennessee Department of HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthDivision of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of HealthAbstract Background Cryptosporidiosis is a leading cause of zoonotic illness. We aimed to describe cryptosporidiosis illnesses in Tennessee by species and molecular subtypes, and explore epidemiological risk factors. Methods Cryptosporidium is a reportable condition in Tennessee. Cases are investigated and molecular subtyping is performed. Collected data includes patient demographics, risk factors, laboratory results, and Cryptosporidium species and subtype. We described Tennessee residents with cryptosporidiosis during 2018–2023. To explore risk factors, we used binomial probabilities to compare exposure frequencies with the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) Population Survey. Results During 2018–2023, Tennessee recorded 1174 cryptosporidiosis cases. Of those, 282 (24%) had species information and 214 (18%) had genotype information. Of 802 laboratory-confirmed cases without species information, 664 (83%) did not have a specimen submitted for molecular subtyping. Most frequently identified species were C. parvum (n = 183, 65%) and C. hominis (n = 60, 21%) with most frequently identified subtypes being C. parvum subtypes IIaA15G2R1 (n = 80) and IIaA15G2R2 (n = 15), and C. hominis subtype IfA12G1R5 (n = 15). C. felis (n = 8), C. ubiquitum (n = 5), C. meleagridis (n = 3), C. canis (n = 2), and C. deer mouse subtypes (n = 2) were also identified. Rates were higher for C. parvum in rural counties and C. hominis in urban counties. Persons with C. parvum infections more often reported contact with goats, cows, or sheep compared to the population (39% vs. 6%, P <.001). Persons with C. hominis infections more often reported contact with natural (22% vs. 9%, P =.003) and treated (32% vs. 12%, P <.001) water, and having contact with another person with diarrheal illness (28% vs. 15%, P =.013). Conclusions Molecular cryptosporidiosis surveillance can facilitate more detailed understanding of cryptosporidiosis risk factors and prevention measures. To best use this tool, a greater proportion of specimens need to be submitted for molecular subtyping.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11364-wSurveillanceSubtypeVariantPopulation
spellingShingle Christine M. Thomas
Emma Roth
Christian Mackley
Dalton Ford
Dilani Goonewardene
Dorothy Baynham
William Schaffner
Mary-Margaret A. Fill
Jane Yackley
John R. Dunn
Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
BMC Infectious Diseases
Surveillance
Subtype
Variant
Population
title Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
title_full Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
title_fullStr Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
title_short Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Tennessee, 2018–2023
title_sort risk factors associated with cryptosporidium species and genotypes in tennessee 2018 2023
topic Surveillance
Subtype
Variant
Population
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11364-w
work_keys_str_mv AT christinemthomas riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT emmaroth riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT christianmackley riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT daltonford riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT dilanigoonewardene riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT dorothybaynham riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT williamschaffner riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT marymargaretafill riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT janeyackley riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023
AT johnrdunn riskfactorsassociatedwithcryptosporidiumspeciesandgenotypesintennessee20182023