Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping

Abstract High temporal and high spatial resolution geoelectric field models of two Mäntsälä, Finnish pipeline geomagnetically induced current (GIC) intervals that occurred within the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm have been made. The geomagnetic measurements with 10 s sampling rate of 28 IMAGE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Wawrzaszek, Agnieszka Gil, Renata Modzelewska, Bruce T. Tsurutani, Roman Wawrzaszek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003383
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536519233339392
author Anna Wawrzaszek
Agnieszka Gil
Renata Modzelewska
Bruce T. Tsurutani
Roman Wawrzaszek
author_facet Anna Wawrzaszek
Agnieszka Gil
Renata Modzelewska
Bruce T. Tsurutani
Roman Wawrzaszek
author_sort Anna Wawrzaszek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract High temporal and high spatial resolution geoelectric field models of two Mäntsälä, Finnish pipeline geomagnetically induced current (GIC) intervals that occurred within the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm have been made. The geomagnetic measurements with 10 s sampling rate of 28 IMAGE ground magnetometers distributed over the north Europe (from 52.07° to 69.76° latitude) are the bases for the study. A GeoElectric Dynamic Mapping (GEDMap) code was developed for this task. GEDMap considers 4 different methods of interpolation and allows a grid of 0.05° (lat.) × 0.2° (lon.) spatial scale resolution. The geoelectric field dynamic mapping output gives both spatial and temporal variations of the magnitude and direction of fields. The GEDMap results show very rapid and strong variability of geoelectric field and the extremely localized peak enhancements. The magnitude of geoelectric fields over Mäntsälä at the time of the two GIC peaks were 279.7 and 336.9 mV/km. The comparison of the GIC measurements in Mäntsälä and our modeling results show very good agreement with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.8. It is found that the auroral electrojet geoelectric field has very rapid changes in both magnitude and orientation causing the GICs. It is also shown that the electrojet is not simply oriented in the east‐west direction. It is possible that even higher time resolution base magnetometer data of 1 s will yield even more structure, so this will be our next effort.
format Article
id doaj-art-d2931e70d6ae41a1ab4fadb0a8bc33fb
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-d2931e70d6ae41a1ab4fadb0a8bc33fb2025-01-14T16:27:17ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902023-03-01213n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003383Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field MappingAnna Wawrzaszek0Agnieszka Gil1Renata Modzelewska2Bruce T. Tsurutani3Roman Wawrzaszek4Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN) Warsaw PolandSpace Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN) Warsaw PolandFaculty of Exact and Natural Sciences Institute of Mathematics Siedlce University Siedlce PolandJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USASpace Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN) Warsaw PolandAbstract High temporal and high spatial resolution geoelectric field models of two Mäntsälä, Finnish pipeline geomagnetically induced current (GIC) intervals that occurred within the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm have been made. The geomagnetic measurements with 10 s sampling rate of 28 IMAGE ground magnetometers distributed over the north Europe (from 52.07° to 69.76° latitude) are the bases for the study. A GeoElectric Dynamic Mapping (GEDMap) code was developed for this task. GEDMap considers 4 different methods of interpolation and allows a grid of 0.05° (lat.) × 0.2° (lon.) spatial scale resolution. The geoelectric field dynamic mapping output gives both spatial and temporal variations of the magnitude and direction of fields. The GEDMap results show very rapid and strong variability of geoelectric field and the extremely localized peak enhancements. The magnitude of geoelectric fields over Mäntsälä at the time of the two GIC peaks were 279.7 and 336.9 mV/km. The comparison of the GIC measurements in Mäntsälä and our modeling results show very good agreement with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.8. It is found that the auroral electrojet geoelectric field has very rapid changes in both magnitude and orientation causing the GICs. It is also shown that the electrojet is not simply oriented in the east‐west direction. It is possible that even higher time resolution base magnetometer data of 1 s will yield even more structure, so this will be our next effort.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003383geomagnetic stormgeolectric fieldgeomagnetically induced currents
spellingShingle Anna Wawrzaszek
Agnieszka Gil
Renata Modzelewska
Bruce T. Tsurutani
Roman Wawrzaszek
Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
Space Weather
geomagnetic storm
geolectric field
geomagnetically induced currents
title Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
title_full Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
title_fullStr Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
title_short Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
title_sort analysis of large geomagnetically induced currents during the 7 8 september 2017 storm geoelectric field mapping
topic geomagnetic storm
geolectric field
geomagnetically induced currents
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003383
work_keys_str_mv AT annawawrzaszek analysisoflargegeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsduringthe78september2017stormgeoelectricfieldmapping
AT agnieszkagil analysisoflargegeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsduringthe78september2017stormgeoelectricfieldmapping
AT renatamodzelewska analysisoflargegeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsduringthe78september2017stormgeoelectricfieldmapping
AT brucettsurutani analysisoflargegeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsduringthe78september2017stormgeoelectricfieldmapping
AT romanwawrzaszek analysisoflargegeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsduringthe78september2017stormgeoelectricfieldmapping