Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Aims: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods: A literature search was conducted across...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirmohammad Khalifehsoltani, Enwa Felix Oghenemaro, Ahmed Hussein Zwamel, Rekha M.M., Manish Srivastava, Reza Akhavan-Sigari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2024-11-01
Series:European Journal of Translational Myology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/12930
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846149989850415104
author Amirmohammad Khalifehsoltani
Enwa Felix Oghenemaro
Ahmed Hussein Zwamel
Rekha M.M.
Manish Srivastava
Reza Akhavan-Sigari
author_facet Amirmohammad Khalifehsoltani
Enwa Felix Oghenemaro
Ahmed Hussein Zwamel
Rekha M.M.
Manish Srivastava
Reza Akhavan-Sigari
author_sort Amirmohammad Khalifehsoltani
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering studies up to June 2024. Studies comparing PCI and CABG in patients with NSTE-ACS were included, focusing on clinical outcomes such as mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and the need for repeat revascularization. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software, with the Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects model employed to pool effect sizes and assess heterogeneity. Results: A total of 15 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 48,891 patients. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for mortality showed no significant difference between PCI and CABG (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.19, p = 0.28). CABG was associated with a significantly lower risk of subsequent MI (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.61, p < 0.01) and the need for repeat revascularization (RR = 2.94, 95% CI: 2.30-3.76, p < 0.01). Conversely, PCI had a lower associated risk of CVA (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.79, p < 0.01). High heterogeneity was observed in mortality outcomes, indicating variability among studies. Conclusion: The findings suggest that while PCI and CABG have comparable mortality risks in NSTE-ACS patients, CABG offers superior protection against myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization, whereas PCI is associated with a lower risk of cerebrovascular accidents. These results underscore the importance of individualized patient assessment in choosing the optimal revascularization strategy, considering patient-specific risk factors and clinical profiles.
format Article
id doaj-art-d22f3dec34b44edc846e5af2d53fa1cd
institution Kabale University
issn 2037-7452
2037-7460
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series European Journal of Translational Myology
spelling doaj-art-d22f3dec34b44edc846e5af2d53fa1cd2024-11-29T08:16:30ZengPAGEPress PublicationsEuropean Journal of Translational Myology2037-74522037-74602024-11-0110.4081/ejtm.2024.12930Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis StudyAmirmohammad Khalifehsoltani0Enwa Felix Oghenemaro1Ahmed Hussein Zwamel2Rekha M.M.3Manish Srivastava4Reza Akhavan-Sigari5Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran, TehranDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Abraka, Delta State UniversityMedical laboratory technique college, the Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq; Department of medical analysis, Medical laboratory technique college, the Islamic University of Al Diwaniyah, Al Diwaniyah, Iraq; Department of medical analysis, Medical laboratory technique college, the Islamic University of Babylon, BabylonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, KarnatakaDepartment of Endocrinology, National Institute of Medical Sciences, NIMS University Rajasthan, JaipurDreifaltigkeits-Hospital Lippstadt, Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Germany; Department of Health Care Management and Clinical Research, Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University Warsaw Aims: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering studies up to June 2024. Studies comparing PCI and CABG in patients with NSTE-ACS were included, focusing on clinical outcomes such as mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and the need for repeat revascularization. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software, with the Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects model employed to pool effect sizes and assess heterogeneity. Results: A total of 15 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 48,891 patients. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for mortality showed no significant difference between PCI and CABG (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.19, p = 0.28). CABG was associated with a significantly lower risk of subsequent MI (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.61, p < 0.01) and the need for repeat revascularization (RR = 2.94, 95% CI: 2.30-3.76, p < 0.01). Conversely, PCI had a lower associated risk of CVA (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.79, p < 0.01). High heterogeneity was observed in mortality outcomes, indicating variability among studies. Conclusion: The findings suggest that while PCI and CABG have comparable mortality risks in NSTE-ACS patients, CABG offers superior protection against myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization, whereas PCI is associated with a lower risk of cerebrovascular accidents. These results underscore the importance of individualized patient assessment in choosing the optimal revascularization strategy, considering patient-specific risk factors and clinical profiles. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/12930Percutaneous coronary interventioncoronary artery bypass graftingnon-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
spellingShingle Amirmohammad Khalifehsoltani
Enwa Felix Oghenemaro
Ahmed Hussein Zwamel
Rekha M.M.
Manish Srivastava
Reza Akhavan-Sigari
Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
European Journal of Translational Myology
Percutaneous coronary intervention
coronary artery bypass grafting
non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_full Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_fullStr Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_short Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_sort comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft in treatment of non st segment elevation acute coronary syndromes a systematic review and meta analysis study
topic Percutaneous coronary intervention
coronary artery bypass grafting
non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
url https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/12930
work_keys_str_mv AT amirmohammadkhalifehsoltani comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT enwafelixoghenemaro comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT ahmedhusseinzwamel comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT rekhamm comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT manishsrivastava comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT rezaakhavansigari comparingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionandcoronaryarterybypassgraftintreatmentofnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy