Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey

Abstract Background Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjali Vaidya, Margaret R. Sketch, Meredith Broderick, Oksana A. Shlobin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846158841505382400
author Anjali Vaidya
Margaret R. Sketch
Meredith Broderick
Oksana A. Shlobin
author_facet Anjali Vaidya
Margaret R. Sketch
Meredith Broderick
Oksana A. Shlobin
author_sort Anjali Vaidya
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model. Methods This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up). Results A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up. Conclusions Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-d21c1441f55344fea0f2c81cf05617e0
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2466
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d21c1441f55344fea0f2c81cf05617e02024-11-24T12:08:55ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662024-11-0124111510.1186/s12890-024-03388-wParenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional surveyAnjali Vaidya0Margaret R. Sketch1Meredith Broderick2Oksana A. Shlobin3Temple University Lewis Katz School of MedicineUnited Therapeutics CorporationUnited Therapeutics CorporationInova Fairfax Hospital, University of Virginia School of MedicineAbstract Background Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model. Methods This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up). Results A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up. Conclusions Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03388-wRetrospective studiesProstacyclinsProstaglandinsRisk assessmentPulmonary hypertension
spellingShingle Anjali Vaidya
Margaret R. Sketch
Meredith Broderick
Oksana A. Shlobin
Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Retrospective studies
Prostacyclins
Prostaglandins
Risk assessment
Pulmonary hypertension
title Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
title_full Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
title_short Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
title_sort parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate risk strata a retrospective chart review and cross sectional survey
topic Retrospective studies
Prostacyclins
Prostaglandins
Risk assessment
Pulmonary hypertension
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalivaidya parenteralprostacyclinutilizationinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionintheintermediateriskstrataaretrospectivechartreviewandcrosssectionalsurvey
AT margaretrsketch parenteralprostacyclinutilizationinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionintheintermediateriskstrataaretrospectivechartreviewandcrosssectionalsurvey
AT meredithbroderick parenteralprostacyclinutilizationinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionintheintermediateriskstrataaretrospectivechartreviewandcrosssectionalsurvey
AT oksanaashlobin parenteralprostacyclinutilizationinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionintheintermediateriskstrataaretrospectivechartreviewandcrosssectionalsurvey