Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning
Recent research has highlighted a notable confidence bias in the haptic sense, yet its impact on learning relative to other senses remains unexplored. This online study investigated learning behaviour across visual, auditory, and haptic modalities using a probabilistic selection task on computers an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024173616 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841526229254012928 |
|---|---|
| author | Wenhan Sun Isabelle Ripp Aylin Borrmann Maximilian Moll Merle Fairhurst |
| author_facet | Wenhan Sun Isabelle Ripp Aylin Borrmann Maximilian Moll Merle Fairhurst |
| author_sort | Wenhan Sun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Recent research has highlighted a notable confidence bias in the haptic sense, yet its impact on learning relative to other senses remains unexplored. This online study investigated learning behaviour across visual, auditory, and haptic modalities using a probabilistic selection task on computers and mobile devices, employing dynamic and ecologically valid stimuli to enhance generalisability. We analysed reaction time as an indicator of confidence, alongside learning speed and task accuracy. Our results revealed the fastest reaction times with haptic stimuli, suggesting heightened perceptual confidence, whereas visual stimuli were the slowest, and auditory stimuli were intermediate. Despite these differences, all modalities demonstrated consistent learning speeds and accuracies. These findings support the ‘common currency’ hypothesis of perceptual confidence, facilitating modality-independent meta-representations for efficient decision-making. Additionally, reaction times were significantly faster on touch-based mobile devices compared to computers, underscoring the metacognitive efficiency of haptic feedback in technology-enhanced environments. The combination of faster reaction time in the haptic modality without sacrificing accuracy and the enhanced efficiency of touch-based interfaces advocates for the integration of haptics in technological designs to boost efficiency while maintaining a high level of precision. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d1874abedf8e4e8cb9025326f9c2b6c4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj-art-d1874abedf8e4e8cb9025326f9c2b6c42025-01-17T04:50:56ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402025-01-01111e41330Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learningWenhan Sun0Isabelle Ripp1Aylin Borrmann2Maximilian Moll3Merle Fairhurst4Faculty of Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany; Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), 6G Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Acoustics and Haptics, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Corresponding author. CVBE, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Gabelsbergerstraße 62, 80333 Munich, Germany.Faculty of Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, GermanyInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematics and Operations Research, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, GermanyInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematics and Operations Research, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, GermanyCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), 6G Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Acoustics and Haptics, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, GermanyRecent research has highlighted a notable confidence bias in the haptic sense, yet its impact on learning relative to other senses remains unexplored. This online study investigated learning behaviour across visual, auditory, and haptic modalities using a probabilistic selection task on computers and mobile devices, employing dynamic and ecologically valid stimuli to enhance generalisability. We analysed reaction time as an indicator of confidence, alongside learning speed and task accuracy. Our results revealed the fastest reaction times with haptic stimuli, suggesting heightened perceptual confidence, whereas visual stimuli were the slowest, and auditory stimuli were intermediate. Despite these differences, all modalities demonstrated consistent learning speeds and accuracies. These findings support the ‘common currency’ hypothesis of perceptual confidence, facilitating modality-independent meta-representations for efficient decision-making. Additionally, reaction times were significantly faster on touch-based mobile devices compared to computers, underscoring the metacognitive efficiency of haptic feedback in technology-enhanced environments. The combination of faster reaction time in the haptic modality without sacrificing accuracy and the enhanced efficiency of touch-based interfaces advocates for the integration of haptics in technological designs to boost efficiency while maintaining a high level of precision.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024173616 |
| spellingShingle | Wenhan Sun Isabelle Ripp Aylin Borrmann Maximilian Moll Merle Fairhurst Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning Heliyon |
| title | Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| title_full | Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| title_fullStr | Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| title_short | Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| title_sort | touch driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross sensory comparison of reinforcement learning |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024173616 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wenhansun touchdrivenadvantagesinreactiontimebutnotinperformanceinacrosssensorycomparisonofreinforcementlearning AT isabelleripp touchdrivenadvantagesinreactiontimebutnotinperformanceinacrosssensorycomparisonofreinforcementlearning AT aylinborrmann touchdrivenadvantagesinreactiontimebutnotinperformanceinacrosssensorycomparisonofreinforcementlearning AT maximilianmoll touchdrivenadvantagesinreactiontimebutnotinperformanceinacrosssensorycomparisonofreinforcementlearning AT merlefairhurst touchdrivenadvantagesinreactiontimebutnotinperformanceinacrosssensorycomparisonofreinforcementlearning |