Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies

Under the growing pressure of financial markets, the shrinking of public resources and services have been justified by discourses on inefficiency or redundancy in cities adhering to a dominant growth paradigm in urban development and planning, within the framework of austerity policies. Related rig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luisa Rossini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AESOP Association of the European Schools of Planning 2025-05-01
Series:PlaNext
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/193
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849326243479027712
author Luisa Rossini
author_facet Luisa Rossini
author_sort Luisa Rossini
collection DOAJ
description Under the growing pressure of financial markets, the shrinking of public resources and services have been justified by discourses on inefficiency or redundancy in cities adhering to a dominant growth paradigm in urban development and planning, within the framework of austerity policies. Related rightsizing policies are then identifiable as forms of smart shrinkage and can be described as exclusionary projects in a context of increasing social polarisation. In response to these developments, groups of inhabitants have begun employing reclaiming strategies for the co-/self-management of public spaces and services, countering the conversion of common, collective, and state forms of property rights into exclusive private property rights. While these initiatives may, on one hand, be driven by the mainstream rhetoric of the citizen entrepreneurship, social market and “Big Society,” which often align with neoliberal frameworks emphasising privatization and individual responsibility, on the other hand, these forms of “subsidiarity with the state” emerged from a counter rhetoric rooted in solidarity, social sustainability and urban justice. This counter rhetoric advocates for collective, community-driven approaches challenging the logic of privatisation and for more equitable and sustainable planning models. Building on these reflections, the article seeks to analyse a paradigmatic case of resistance against privatization through the creation of a radical alternative social project for the self-management of public spaces and service delivery. By examining the compelling case of the illegal occupations and subsequent legalisations of the former hospital Bethanien in Berlin, the article explores how this experience of self-management demonstrated effective alternatives to the reduction of public spaces through the implementation of bottom-up practices aligned with the principles of degrowth.
format Article
id doaj-art-d115c3e5d39d42a19cdb1e5b99837a11
institution Kabale University
issn 2468-0648
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher AESOP Association of the European Schools of Planning
record_format Article
series PlaNext
spelling doaj-art-d115c3e5d39d42a19cdb1e5b99837a112025-08-20T03:48:11ZengAESOP Association of the European Schools of PlanningPlaNext2468-06482025-05-011410.24306/plnxt/99Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policiesLuisa Rossini0ICS – University of Lisbon, Portugal Under the growing pressure of financial markets, the shrinking of public resources and services have been justified by discourses on inefficiency or redundancy in cities adhering to a dominant growth paradigm in urban development and planning, within the framework of austerity policies. Related rightsizing policies are then identifiable as forms of smart shrinkage and can be described as exclusionary projects in a context of increasing social polarisation. In response to these developments, groups of inhabitants have begun employing reclaiming strategies for the co-/self-management of public spaces and services, countering the conversion of common, collective, and state forms of property rights into exclusive private property rights. While these initiatives may, on one hand, be driven by the mainstream rhetoric of the citizen entrepreneurship, social market and “Big Society,” which often align with neoliberal frameworks emphasising privatization and individual responsibility, on the other hand, these forms of “subsidiarity with the state” emerged from a counter rhetoric rooted in solidarity, social sustainability and urban justice. This counter rhetoric advocates for collective, community-driven approaches challenging the logic of privatisation and for more equitable and sustainable planning models. Building on these reflections, the article seeks to analyse a paradigmatic case of resistance against privatization through the creation of a radical alternative social project for the self-management of public spaces and service delivery. By examining the compelling case of the illegal occupations and subsequent legalisations of the former hospital Bethanien in Berlin, the article explores how this experience of self-management demonstrated effective alternatives to the reduction of public spaces through the implementation of bottom-up practices aligned with the principles of degrowth. https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/193grassroots urbanismpublic space privatizationsmart shrinkingausterityurban degrowthBerlin
spellingShingle Luisa Rossini
Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
PlaNext
grassroots urbanism
public space privatization
smart shrinking
austerity
urban degrowth
Berlin
title Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
title_full Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
title_fullStr Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
title_full_unstemmed Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
title_short Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
title_sort reclaiming public spaces radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies
topic grassroots urbanism
public space privatization
smart shrinking
austerity
urban degrowth
Berlin
url https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/193
work_keys_str_mv AT luisarossini reclaimingpublicspacesradicalalternativestotheexclusionaryprojectofrightsizingpolicies