Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation

Innovation is fundamental for development and provides a competitive advantage for societies. It is the process of creating more complex technologies, ideas, or protocols from existing ones. While innovation may be created by single agents (i.e. individuals or organisations), it is often a result of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F Zarei, J Ryckebusch, K Schoors, L E C Rocha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Physics: Complexity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac9447
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846164015109111808
author F Zarei
J Ryckebusch
K Schoors
L E C Rocha
author_facet F Zarei
J Ryckebusch
K Schoors
L E C Rocha
author_sort F Zarei
collection DOAJ
description Innovation is fundamental for development and provides a competitive advantage for societies. It is the process of creating more complex technologies, ideas, or protocols from existing ones. While innovation may be created by single agents (i.e. individuals or organisations), it is often a result of social interactions between agents exchanging and combining complementary expertise and perspectives. The structure of social networks impacts this knowledge exchange process. To study the role of social network structures on the creation of new technologies, we design an evolutionary mechanistic model combining self-creation and social learning. We find that social heterogeneity allows agents to leverage the benefits of diversity and to develop technologies of higher complexity. Social heterogeneity, however, reduces the group ability to innovate. Not only the social structure but also the openness of agents to collaborate affect innovation. We find that interdisciplinary interactions lead to more complex technologies benefiting the entire group but also increase the inequality in the innovation output. Lower openness to interdisciplinary collaborations may be compensated by a higher ability to collaborate with multiple peers, but low openness also neutralises the intrinsic benefits of network heterogeneity. Our findings indicate that social network heterogeneity has contrasting effects on microscopic (local) and macroscopic (group) levels, suggesting that the emergence of innovation leaders may suppress the overall group performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-cfb2c866099b442d9aa84de50b2a06b2
institution Kabale University
issn 2632-072X
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Physics: Complexity
spelling doaj-art-cfb2c866099b442d9aa84de50b2a06b22024-11-18T18:06:11ZengIOP PublishingJournal of Physics: Complexity2632-072X2022-01-013404500210.1088/2632-072X/ac9447Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovationF Zarei0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-6107J Ryckebusch1K Schoors2L E C Rocha3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-8739Department of Economics, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University , Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University , Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Economics, Ghent University , Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Economics, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University , Ghent, BelgiumInnovation is fundamental for development and provides a competitive advantage for societies. It is the process of creating more complex technologies, ideas, or protocols from existing ones. While innovation may be created by single agents (i.e. individuals or organisations), it is often a result of social interactions between agents exchanging and combining complementary expertise and perspectives. The structure of social networks impacts this knowledge exchange process. To study the role of social network structures on the creation of new technologies, we design an evolutionary mechanistic model combining self-creation and social learning. We find that social heterogeneity allows agents to leverage the benefits of diversity and to develop technologies of higher complexity. Social heterogeneity, however, reduces the group ability to innovate. Not only the social structure but also the openness of agents to collaborate affect innovation. We find that interdisciplinary interactions lead to more complex technologies benefiting the entire group but also increase the inequality in the innovation output. Lower openness to interdisciplinary collaborations may be compensated by a higher ability to collaborate with multiple peers, but low openness also neutralises the intrinsic benefits of network heterogeneity. Our findings indicate that social network heterogeneity has contrasting effects on microscopic (local) and macroscopic (group) levels, suggesting that the emergence of innovation leaders may suppress the overall group performance.https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac9447innovationsocial networkssocial heterogeneityagent based modellingcreation of ideascollaboration
spellingShingle F Zarei
J Ryckebusch
K Schoors
L E C Rocha
Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
Journal of Physics: Complexity
innovation
social networks
social heterogeneity
agent based modelling
creation of ideas
collaboration
title Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
title_full Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
title_fullStr Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
title_full_unstemmed Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
title_short Social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
title_sort social network heterogeneity benefits individuals at the expense of groups in the creation of innovation
topic innovation
social networks
social heterogeneity
agent based modelling
creation of ideas
collaboration
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac9447
work_keys_str_mv AT fzarei socialnetworkheterogeneitybenefitsindividualsattheexpenseofgroupsinthecreationofinnovation
AT jryckebusch socialnetworkheterogeneitybenefitsindividualsattheexpenseofgroupsinthecreationofinnovation
AT kschoors socialnetworkheterogeneitybenefitsindividualsattheexpenseofgroupsinthecreationofinnovation
AT lecrocha socialnetworkheterogeneitybenefitsindividualsattheexpenseofgroupsinthecreationofinnovation