Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study
Aim: In this in vitro study, the microleakage evaluation of repaired pit and fissure sealants with various surface treatments was compared. Study Design: The study included 120 extracted human third molars. The teeth were divided into two groups of 60 each. Group 1 was sealed with Clinpro™ unfilled...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_885_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841543568720658432 |
|---|---|
| author | R K Sarada Devi C. Nagarathna Ratna Yumkham Shamilah Khanam Ishani Ningthoujam Pukhrambam Nirmada |
| author_facet | R K Sarada Devi C. Nagarathna Ratna Yumkham Shamilah Khanam Ishani Ningthoujam Pukhrambam Nirmada |
| author_sort | R K Sarada Devi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim:
In this in vitro study, the microleakage evaluation of repaired pit and fissure sealants with various surface treatments was compared.
Study Design:
The study included 120 extracted human third molars. The teeth were divided into two groups of 60 each. Group 1 was sealed with Clinpro™ unfilled sealant, while group 2 was sealed with Grandioseal nanofilled sealants. After curing, half of the polymerized sealant were removed. Both groups were divided further into two subgroups of 30 teeth each, with repair techniques using either Adper Easy One or Futura Bond. Three sections were obtained from each tooth resulting 6 surfaces per tooth to be examined and the sections of all four groups were scored for microleakage.
Results:
Conventional acid etching was found to be superior to self-etch adhesive technique.
Conclusion:
Microleakage was found to be greater with Grandio seal compared to Clinpro. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cf83d36a36de4fd9acb813d554691d5f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-cf83d36a36de4fd9acb813d554691d5f2025-01-13T09:49:19ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3408S341110.4103/jpbs.jpbs_885_24Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro StudyR K Sarada DeviC. NagarathnaRatna YumkhamShamilah KhanamIshani NingthoujamPukhrambam NirmadaAim: In this in vitro study, the microleakage evaluation of repaired pit and fissure sealants with various surface treatments was compared. Study Design: The study included 120 extracted human third molars. The teeth were divided into two groups of 60 each. Group 1 was sealed with Clinpro™ unfilled sealant, while group 2 was sealed with Grandioseal nanofilled sealants. After curing, half of the polymerized sealant were removed. Both groups were divided further into two subgroups of 30 teeth each, with repair techniques using either Adper Easy One or Futura Bond. Three sections were obtained from each tooth resulting 6 surfaces per tooth to be examined and the sections of all four groups were scored for microleakage. Results: Conventional acid etching was found to be superior to self-etch adhesive technique. Conclusion: Microleakage was found to be greater with Grandio seal compared to Clinpro.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_885_24cariesmicroleakagepit and fissure sealant |
| spellingShingle | R K Sarada Devi C. Nagarathna Ratna Yumkham Shamilah Khanam Ishani Ningthoujam Pukhrambam Nirmada Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences caries microleakage pit and fissure sealant |
| title | Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study |
| title_full | Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study |
| title_short | Microleakage Assessment of Repaired Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Different Surface Treatment – An In vitro Study |
| title_sort | microleakage assessment of repaired pit and fissure sealants using different surface treatment an in vitro study |
| topic | caries microleakage pit and fissure sealant |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_885_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rksaradadevi microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy AT cnagarathna microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy AT ratnayumkham microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy AT shamilahkhanam microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy AT ishaniningthoujam microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy AT pukhrambamnirmada microleakageassessmentofrepairedpitandfissuresealantsusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy |