Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland

Aim The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of the Pill Protect (PP) genetic screening test for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk compared with standard of care (SoC), for women considering combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in Switzerland.Methods A two-part microsimulation m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zanfina Ademi, C Simone Sutherland, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Nadine Schur, Joëlle Michaud, Myriam Lingg, Arjun Bhadhuri, Thierry D. Pache, Johannes Bitzer, Pierre Suchon, Valerie Albert, Kurt E. Hersberger, Goranka Tanackovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e031325.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846150059965546496
author Zanfina Ademi
C Simone Sutherland
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Nadine Schur
Joëlle Michaud
Myriam Lingg
Arjun Bhadhuri
Thierry D. Pache
Johannes Bitzer
Pierre Suchon
Valerie Albert
Kurt E. Hersberger
Goranka Tanackovic
author_facet Zanfina Ademi
C Simone Sutherland
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Nadine Schur
Joëlle Michaud
Myriam Lingg
Arjun Bhadhuri
Thierry D. Pache
Johannes Bitzer
Pierre Suchon
Valerie Albert
Kurt E. Hersberger
Goranka Tanackovic
author_sort Zanfina Ademi
collection DOAJ
description Aim The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of the Pill Protect (PP) genetic screening test for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk compared with standard of care (SoC), for women considering combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in Switzerland.Methods A two-part microsimulation model was developed to estimate VTE events, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the PP and SoC strategies. In the first portion of the model, a cohort of 1 million Swiss first-time seekers of a CHC were simulated. It was determined whether each women would receive a CHC or non-CHC by using prescribing patterns elicited from a modified Delphi study. These results formed the basis of the SoC strategy. For the PP strategy, a PP test was included and the results considered in addition to SoC practice. Each woman then entered a Markov model that captured morbidity and mortality over a lifetime. The risk of having a VTE was derived from the risk algorithm that underpins the PP test. The remaining model inputs relating to population characteristics, costs, health resource use, mortality and utilities were derived from published studies or national sources. The model was validated and calibrated to align with population-based studies. Extensive uncertainty analyses were conducted.Results From a Swiss health system perspective, the PP strategy in comparison with the SoC strategy generated an additional CHF 231, and gained 0.003 QALYs per woman, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 76 610 per QALY gained. Assuming a threshold of CHF 100 000 per QALY gained, the PP strategy is likely to be cost effective. Our results were generally robust to variations in the parameter values.Conclusions The PP test may be cost effective in Switzerland for screening women seeking CHCs for their risk of VTE based on the current evidence.
format Article
id doaj-art-cf7065f45fa746728421254ea1594e5e
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-cf7065f45fa746728421254ea1594e5e2024-11-29T06:35:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-11-0191110.1136/bmjopen-2019-031325Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in SwitzerlandZanfina Ademi0C Simone Sutherland1Matthias Schwenkglenks2Nadine Schur3Joëlle Michaud4Myriam Lingg5Arjun Bhadhuri6Thierry D. Pache7Johannes Bitzer8Pierre Suchon9Valerie Albert10Kurt E. Hersberger11Goranka Tanackovic12School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland27 Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland3 Gene Predictis SA, Lausanne, Switzerland1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland4 Women’s Health Watch, Clarens-Montreux, Switzerland3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland6 Laboratory of Haematology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France8 Pharmaceutical Care Research Group (PCRG), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland8 Pharmaceutical Care Research Group (PCRG), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland3 Gene Predictis SA, Lausanne, SwitzerlandAim The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of the Pill Protect (PP) genetic screening test for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk compared with standard of care (SoC), for women considering combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in Switzerland.Methods A two-part microsimulation model was developed to estimate VTE events, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the PP and SoC strategies. In the first portion of the model, a cohort of 1 million Swiss first-time seekers of a CHC were simulated. It was determined whether each women would receive a CHC or non-CHC by using prescribing patterns elicited from a modified Delphi study. These results formed the basis of the SoC strategy. For the PP strategy, a PP test was included and the results considered in addition to SoC practice. Each woman then entered a Markov model that captured morbidity and mortality over a lifetime. The risk of having a VTE was derived from the risk algorithm that underpins the PP test. The remaining model inputs relating to population characteristics, costs, health resource use, mortality and utilities were derived from published studies or national sources. The model was validated and calibrated to align with population-based studies. Extensive uncertainty analyses were conducted.Results From a Swiss health system perspective, the PP strategy in comparison with the SoC strategy generated an additional CHF 231, and gained 0.003 QALYs per woman, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 76 610 per QALY gained. Assuming a threshold of CHF 100 000 per QALY gained, the PP strategy is likely to be cost effective. Our results were generally robust to variations in the parameter values.Conclusions The PP test may be cost effective in Switzerland for screening women seeking CHCs for their risk of VTE based on the current evidence.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e031325.full
spellingShingle Zanfina Ademi
C Simone Sutherland
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Nadine Schur
Joëlle Michaud
Myriam Lingg
Arjun Bhadhuri
Thierry D. Pache
Johannes Bitzer
Pierre Suchon
Valerie Albert
Kurt E. Hersberger
Goranka Tanackovic
Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
BMJ Open
title Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
title_full Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
title_short Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
title_sort economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in switzerland
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e031325.full
work_keys_str_mv AT zanfinaademi economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT csimonesutherland economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT matthiasschwenkglenks economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT nadineschur economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT joellemichaud economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT myriamlingg economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT arjunbhadhuri economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT thierrydpache economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT johannesbitzer economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT pierresuchon economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT valeriealbert economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT kurtehersberger economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland
AT gorankatanackovic economicevaluationofanovelgeneticscreeningtestforriskofvenousthromboembolismcomparedwithstandardofcareinwomenconsideringcombinedhormonalcontraceptioninswitzerland