Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems

Abstract Common difficulties across industries are discovered in data management, where handling the volume, variety, and quality of data is crucial for informed decisions in uncertain environments. In this context, rail management must navigate complex decision‐making to ensure safety, service cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corneliu Cotet, Peter Kawalek, Thomas Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:IET Intelligent Transport Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12598
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846118206793580544
author Corneliu Cotet
Peter Kawalek
Thomas Jackson
author_facet Corneliu Cotet
Peter Kawalek
Thomas Jackson
author_sort Corneliu Cotet
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Common difficulties across industries are discovered in data management, where handling the volume, variety, and quality of data is crucial for informed decisions in uncertain environments. In this context, rail management must navigate complex decision‐making to ensure safety, service continuity, and cost‐effectiveness. The 2020 Stonehaven derailment is an example of the increasing vulnerability of rail infrastructure to environmental factors and systemic failures. It emphasizes the need for resilient systems, proficient at preventative maintenance and adaptable to escalating challenges. These matters further accentuate the need for context‐dependent strategies that bridge theoretical insights and practical applications. This scoping review explores strategies for decision‐making under uncertainty across sectors such as civil infrastructure, agriculture, water management, and emergency response. It unfolds a selection of procedures addressing the impacts of extreme weather and other unexpected disruptions. It also sets a foundation for future research to support rail infrastructure adaptation to climate change by advocating the use of cybernetic principles and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance decision‐making processes. Cybernetics enables collaborative human‐AI methods, improving adaptability and resilience. However, balancing and incorporating diverse stakeholder viewpoints into decision chains remains difficult. While promising, substantial research and system improvements are needed to fully harness the potential of AI.
format Article
id doaj-art-cf2475ade6924038acf5f5d9bb8d1783
institution Kabale University
issn 1751-956X
1751-9578
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Intelligent Transport Systems
spelling doaj-art-cf2475ade6924038acf5f5d9bb8d17832024-12-18T04:38:04ZengWileyIET Intelligent Transport Systems1751-956X1751-95782024-12-0118S12814282610.1049/itr2.12598Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systemsCorneliu Cotet0Peter Kawalek1Thomas Jackson2School of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUKSchool of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUKSchool of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUKAbstract Common difficulties across industries are discovered in data management, where handling the volume, variety, and quality of data is crucial for informed decisions in uncertain environments. In this context, rail management must navigate complex decision‐making to ensure safety, service continuity, and cost‐effectiveness. The 2020 Stonehaven derailment is an example of the increasing vulnerability of rail infrastructure to environmental factors and systemic failures. It emphasizes the need for resilient systems, proficient at preventative maintenance and adaptable to escalating challenges. These matters further accentuate the need for context‐dependent strategies that bridge theoretical insights and practical applications. This scoping review explores strategies for decision‐making under uncertainty across sectors such as civil infrastructure, agriculture, water management, and emergency response. It unfolds a selection of procedures addressing the impacts of extreme weather and other unexpected disruptions. It also sets a foundation for future research to support rail infrastructure adaptation to climate change by advocating the use of cybernetic principles and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance decision‐making processes. Cybernetics enables collaborative human‐AI methods, improving adaptability and resilience. However, balancing and incorporating diverse stakeholder viewpoints into decision chains remains difficult. While promising, substantial research and system improvements are needed to fully harness the potential of AI.https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12598cyberneticsdecision‐makingdisruptioninfrastructure resiliencerail transportationuncertainty
spellingShingle Corneliu Cotet
Peter Kawalek
Thomas Jackson
Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
cybernetics
decision‐making
disruption
infrastructure resilience
rail transportation
uncertainty
title Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
title_full Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
title_fullStr Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
title_full_unstemmed Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
title_short Navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles: A scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
title_sort navigating uncertainty with cybernetics principles a scoping review of interdisciplinary resilience strategies for rail systems
topic cybernetics
decision‐making
disruption
infrastructure resilience
rail transportation
uncertainty
url https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12598
work_keys_str_mv AT corneliucotet navigatinguncertaintywithcyberneticsprinciplesascopingreviewofinterdisciplinaryresiliencestrategiesforrailsystems
AT peterkawalek navigatinguncertaintywithcyberneticsprinciplesascopingreviewofinterdisciplinaryresiliencestrategiesforrailsystems
AT thomasjackson navigatinguncertaintywithcyberneticsprinciplesascopingreviewofinterdisciplinaryresiliencestrategiesforrailsystems