„Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления
The article is an attempt to answer the question whether there is a cultural specificity of humour not in form and content, but in the context of pragmatics. Discussing humour from the point of view of its orientation to the addressee, we can distinguish three main options described by the Russian...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Studia Rossica Posnaniensia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/strp/article/view/34349 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846092302897905664 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergey Troitskiy |
| author_facet | Sergey Troitskiy |
| author_sort | Sergey Troitskiy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The article is an attempt to answer the question whether there is a cultural specificity of humour not in form and content, but in the context of pragmatics. Discussing humour from the point of view of its orientation to the addressee, we can distinguish three main options described by the Russian philosopher V. S. Solovyov in connection with humour, these are relations to the highest, to the equal, and to the lowest. Considering that such a simplified scheme exhausts all possible vectors of constructing a message according to the method of interpretation of the addressee (as higher, as lower, as equal), such a seemingly simple classification, however, determines not only the narrative position, but also the content and form of the message, as well as sets other restrictions. The scheme of relations (vectors) rooted in culture and reproduced by it determines not only how a humorous message is constructed, but also in many respects the readiness of the addressee for an adequate reaction in the form of laughter, and whether the author of the humorous message expects this reaction. Thus, one of the tasks of the article is an attempt to explain the specifics of the (unsuccessful) humorous interaction between the carriers of subjects and objects of power. Russian culture is the focus of the article, which is based on Russian sources.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ceda4ad29a1b4b0c8904b94ca1f443d4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0081-6884 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Rossica Posnaniensia |
| spelling | doaj-art-ceda4ad29a1b4b0c8904b94ca1f443d42025-01-02T21:10:01ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz University in PoznańStudia Rossica Posnaniensia0081-68842022-06-0147110.14746/strp.2022.47.1.7„Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явленияSergey Troitskiy0Estonian Literary Museum The article is an attempt to answer the question whether there is a cultural specificity of humour not in form and content, but in the context of pragmatics. Discussing humour from the point of view of its orientation to the addressee, we can distinguish three main options described by the Russian philosopher V. S. Solovyov in connection with humour, these are relations to the highest, to the equal, and to the lowest. Considering that such a simplified scheme exhausts all possible vectors of constructing a message according to the method of interpretation of the addressee (as higher, as lower, as equal), such a seemingly simple classification, however, determines not only the narrative position, but also the content and form of the message, as well as sets other restrictions. The scheme of relations (vectors) rooted in culture and reproduced by it determines not only how a humorous message is constructed, but also in many respects the readiness of the addressee for an adequate reaction in the form of laughter, and whether the author of the humorous message expects this reaction. Thus, one of the tasks of the article is an attempt to explain the specifics of the (unsuccessful) humorous interaction between the carriers of subjects and objects of power. Russian culture is the focus of the article, which is based on Russian sources. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/strp/article/view/34349Russian cultureGelotophobiaVladimir SolovyovauthorityRussian humour |
| spellingShingle | Sergey Troitskiy „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления Studia Rossica Posnaniensia Russian culture Gelotophobia Vladimir Solovyov authority Russian humour |
| title | „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| title_full | „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| title_fullStr | „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| title_full_unstemmed | „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| title_short | „Русский” юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации: причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| title_sort | русский юмор в контексте направлений юмористической коммуникации причины гелотофобии как социального явления |
| topic | Russian culture Gelotophobia Vladimir Solovyov authority Russian humour |
| url | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/strp/article/view/34349 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sergeytroitskiy russkijûmorvkontekstenapravlenijûmorističeskojkommunikaciipričinygelotofobiikaksocialʹnogoâvleniâ |