Phylogenetics of Lepidonotopodini (Macellicephalinae, Polynoidae, Annelida) and Comparative Mitogenomics of Shallow-Water vs. Deep-Sea Scaleworms (Aphroditiformia)

Within Polynoidae, a diverse aphroditiform family, the subfamily Macellicephalinae comprises anchialine cave-dwelling and deep-sea scaleworms. In this study, Lepidonotopodinae is synonymized with Macellicephalinae, and the tribe Lepidonotopodini is applied to a well-supported clade inhabiting deep-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Avery S. Hiley, Nicolás Mongiardino Koch, Greg W. Rouse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/13/12/979
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Within Polynoidae, a diverse aphroditiform family, the subfamily Macellicephalinae comprises anchialine cave-dwelling and deep-sea scaleworms. In this study, Lepidonotopodinae is synonymized with Macellicephalinae, and the tribe Lepidonotopodini is applied to a well-supported clade inhabiting deep-sea chemosynthetic-based ecosystems. Newly sequenced “genome skimming” data for 30 deep-sea polynoids and the comparatively shallow living <i>Eulagisca gigantea</i> is used to bioinformatically assemble their mitogenomes. When analyzed with existing scaleworm mitogenomes, deep-sea scaleworms exhibit increased gene order rearrangement events compared to shallow-water relatives. Additionally, comparative analyses of shallow-water vs. deep-sea polynoid substitution rates in mitochondrial protein-coding genes show an overall relaxed purifying selection and a positive selection of several amino acid sites in deep-sea species, indicating that polynoid mitogenomes have undergone selective pressure to evolve metabolic adaptations suited to deep-sea environments. Furthermore, the inclusion of skimming data for already known Lepidonotopodini species allowed for an increased coverage of DNA data and a representation of the taxa necessary to create a more robust phylogeny using 18 genes, as opposed to the six genes previously used. The phylogenetic results support the erection of <i>Cladopolynoe</i> gen. nov., <i>Mamiwata</i> gen. nov., <i>Photinopolynoe</i> gen. nov., <i>Stratigos</i> gen. nov., and <i>Themis</i> gen. nov., and emended diagnoses for <i>Branchinotogluma, Branchipolynoe</i>, <i>Lepidonotopodium</i>, and <i>Levensteiniella</i>.
ISSN:2079-7737