Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network

Background Safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) was investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, head-to-head trials comparing with conventional systemic drugs are lacking and large real-world data on the long-term safety profile as compared are scarce.Objective To compare l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henner Zirpel, Ralf J. Ludwig, Henning Olbrich, Khalaf Kridin, Sascha Ständer, Diamant Thaçi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09546634.2024.2421429
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846119652471603200
author Henner Zirpel
Ralf J. Ludwig
Henning Olbrich
Khalaf Kridin
Sascha Ständer
Diamant Thaçi
author_facet Henner Zirpel
Ralf J. Ludwig
Henning Olbrich
Khalaf Kridin
Sascha Ständer
Diamant Thaçi
author_sort Henner Zirpel
collection DOAJ
description Background Safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) was investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, head-to-head trials comparing with conventional systemic drugs are lacking and large real-world data on the long-term safety profile as compared are scarce.Objective To compare long-term safety profile of dupilumab with conventional systemic drugs used in the management of moderate to severe AD.Methods Data from electronic health records of AD patients treated with either dupilumab, azathioprine, Cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, or oral glucocorticoids were retrieved from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Risks of adverse events and new onset of type-2-inflammatory diseases within 5 years after treatment initiation was investigated.Results 5 propensity-matched cohorts, up to 18,708 individuals per cohort, were created. Dupilumab treatment displayed reduced risk for diseases of the circulatory, the upper respiratory, and the musculoskeletal system, infections, and type 2 diseases as compared to all other treatment options. In contrast risk for conjunctivitis was increased in dupilumab treated patients as compared to mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate.Conclusion Here presented data indicates that treatment with dupilumab for AD has reduced risk for adverse effects of conventional systemic drugs and thus might be safer. Obtained data should be verified in prospective studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd4d5731e7be4858a0f0ed66af78e90a
institution Kabale University
issn 0954-6634
1471-1753
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatological Treatment
spelling doaj-art-cd4d5731e7be4858a0f0ed66af78e90a2024-12-16T22:53:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Dermatological Treatment0954-66341471-17532024-12-0135110.1080/09546634.2024.2421429Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US networkHenner Zirpel0Ralf J. Ludwig1Henning Olbrich2Khalaf Kridin3Sascha Ständer4Diamant Thaçi5Institute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University-Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyInstitute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University-Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyInstitute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University-Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyBackground Safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) was investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, head-to-head trials comparing with conventional systemic drugs are lacking and large real-world data on the long-term safety profile as compared are scarce.Objective To compare long-term safety profile of dupilumab with conventional systemic drugs used in the management of moderate to severe AD.Methods Data from electronic health records of AD patients treated with either dupilumab, azathioprine, Cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, or oral glucocorticoids were retrieved from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Risks of adverse events and new onset of type-2-inflammatory diseases within 5 years after treatment initiation was investigated.Results 5 propensity-matched cohorts, up to 18,708 individuals per cohort, were created. Dupilumab treatment displayed reduced risk for diseases of the circulatory, the upper respiratory, and the musculoskeletal system, infections, and type 2 diseases as compared to all other treatment options. In contrast risk for conjunctivitis was increased in dupilumab treated patients as compared to mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate.Conclusion Here presented data indicates that treatment with dupilumab for AD has reduced risk for adverse effects of conventional systemic drugs and thus might be safer. Obtained data should be verified in prospective studies.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09546634.2024.2421429Atopic dermatitisdupilumabsafetyriskcomorbiditiesconventional systemic therapy
spellingShingle Henner Zirpel
Ralf J. Ludwig
Henning Olbrich
Khalaf Kridin
Sascha Ständer
Diamant Thaçi
Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Atopic dermatitis
dupilumab
safety
risk
comorbidities
conventional systemic therapy
title Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
title_full Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
title_fullStr Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
title_short Comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment: real world data from the US network
title_sort comparison of safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or conventional systemic treatment real world data from the us network
topic Atopic dermatitis
dupilumab
safety
risk
comorbidities
conventional systemic therapy
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09546634.2024.2421429
work_keys_str_mv AT hennerzirpel comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork
AT ralfjludwig comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork
AT henningolbrich comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork
AT khalafkridin comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork
AT saschastander comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork
AT diamantthaci comparisonofsafetyprofileinpatientswithatopicdermatitistreatedwithdupilumaborconventionalsystemictreatmentrealworlddatafromtheusnetwork