Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan from Different Sources Against Non-<i>Saccharomyces</i> Wine Yeasts as a Tool for Producing Low-Sulphite Wine

Chitosan is used as an antimicrobial agent in different agri-food applications; in winemaking, the use of chitosan from <i>Aspergillus niger</i> is authorized, but other sources of chitin, and consequently of chitosan, are available, such as crustaceans and insects. This work investigate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Tedesco, Rocchina Pietrafesa, Gabriella Siesto, Carmen Scieuzo, Rosanna Salvia, Patrizia Falabella, Angela Capece
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Beverages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/10/4/105
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Chitosan is used as an antimicrobial agent in different agri-food applications; in winemaking, the use of chitosan from <i>Aspergillus niger</i> is authorized, but other sources of chitin, and consequently of chitosan, are available, such as crustaceans and insects. This work investigates the antimicrobial efficiency of chitosan from crustaceans and insects (<i>Hermetia illucens</i>) against non-<i>Saccharomyces</i> yeasts in wine. For this aim, the first step was to evaluate the effect of crustacean chitosan, tested both alone and in combination with low sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations, on the cell viability of 20 non-<i>Saccharomyces</i> strains in the first step of fermentations inoculated with each strain. Furthermore, the strain resistance to crustacean- and insect-based chitosan was evaluated in agarized media, together with the addition of different antimicrobial concentrations. Finally, the efficiency of different antimicrobial treatments was evaluated during laboratory-scale fermentations inoculated with a selected <i>S. cerevisiae</i> strain. The tested strains exhibited medium/high resistance to the chitosan; in some cases, the behaviour varied in the function of species/strain, and only four strains exhibited different resistance levels, depending on the chitosan source. The addition of chitosan alone during fermentation inoculated with <i>S. cerevisiae</i> showed lower antimicrobial activity than SO<sub>2</sub>, but the combined use with SO<sub>2</sub> showed a better effect than chitosan alone. The evaluation of the suitability of chitosan obtained from a sustainable source, such as insects, will allow us to give new information on the future applications of this natural compound for the production of wine with low sulphite content.
ISSN:2306-5710