Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice

Introduction:. Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) poses a major problem of public health, with high prevalence rates and economic burden. There is a wealth of clinical trials examining pharmacological interventions for patients with CPMP. Nevertheless, evidence from such trials does not nec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Koechlin, Cedric Werdelis, Antonia Barke, Beatrice Korwisi, Roland von Känel, Julia Wagner, Cosima Locher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2025-02-01
Series:PAIN Reports
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001216
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846110354265866240
author Helen Koechlin
Cedric Werdelis
Antonia Barke
Beatrice Korwisi
Roland von Känel
Julia Wagner
Cosima Locher
author_facet Helen Koechlin
Cedric Werdelis
Antonia Barke
Beatrice Korwisi
Roland von Känel
Julia Wagner
Cosima Locher
author_sort Helen Koechlin
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:. Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) poses a major problem of public health, with high prevalence rates and economic burden. There is a wealth of clinical trials examining pharmacological interventions for patients with CPMP. Nevertheless, evidence from such trials does not necessarily mirror clinical realities. Objectives:. We aimed to compare data sets from a clinical sample with an randomized controlled trial (RCT)-based sample. Methods:. Both data sets included participants living with CPMP who received pharmacological interventions. The clinical sample was retrieved from electronic health records. The RCT-based sample stemmed from a network meta-analysis project. The following outcomes were used: demographic information, diagnosis-specific data, and pharmacological interventions (categorized according to the World Health Organization [WHO] analgesic ladder). Results:. The clinical sample consisted of 103 patients (mean age: 50.25 years; SD: 14.0) and the RCT-based samples contributed 8665 participants (mean age: 51.97 years; SD: 6.74). In both samples, the proportion of women was higher than that of men (ie, 74.8% vs 58.9%). Psychiatric disorders were the most common comorbidities in the clinic sample but also the most frequent reason for patient exclusion in RCTs. The 2 samples differed significantly in medication classified as WHO III (clinical sample: 12.9%; RCT sample: 23.5%; P = 0.023) and WHO IV (clinical sample: 23.4%; RCT sample: 8.6%; P < 0.001), yet not WHO I and II. Conclusion:. Our findings suggest a disparity between research-based study populations and clinical populations with CPMP. We advocate for future investigations on how to implement robust scientific evidence into real-world clinical practice, with a particular focus on addressing psychiatric comorbidities.
format Article
id doaj-art-cc7d33ffcb9141a8958138e464a65d5a
institution Kabale University
issn 2471-2531
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series PAIN Reports
spelling doaj-art-cc7d33ffcb9141a8958138e464a65d5a2024-12-24T09:47:10ZengWolters KluwerPAIN Reports2471-25312025-02-01101e121610.1097/PR9.0000000000001216PR90000000000001216Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practiceHelen Koechlin0Cedric Werdelis1Antonia Barke2Beatrice Korwisi3Roland von Känel4Julia Wagner5Cosima Locher6a Department of Psychosomatics and Psychiatry, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerlandd Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerlande Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Intervention, Department of Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germanye Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Intervention, Department of Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germanyd Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerlandd Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerlandd Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandIntroduction:. Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) poses a major problem of public health, with high prevalence rates and economic burden. There is a wealth of clinical trials examining pharmacological interventions for patients with CPMP. Nevertheless, evidence from such trials does not necessarily mirror clinical realities. Objectives:. We aimed to compare data sets from a clinical sample with an randomized controlled trial (RCT)-based sample. Methods:. Both data sets included participants living with CPMP who received pharmacological interventions. The clinical sample was retrieved from electronic health records. The RCT-based sample stemmed from a network meta-analysis project. The following outcomes were used: demographic information, diagnosis-specific data, and pharmacological interventions (categorized according to the World Health Organization [WHO] analgesic ladder). Results:. The clinical sample consisted of 103 patients (mean age: 50.25 years; SD: 14.0) and the RCT-based samples contributed 8665 participants (mean age: 51.97 years; SD: 6.74). In both samples, the proportion of women was higher than that of men (ie, 74.8% vs 58.9%). Psychiatric disorders were the most common comorbidities in the clinic sample but also the most frequent reason for patient exclusion in RCTs. The 2 samples differed significantly in medication classified as WHO III (clinical sample: 12.9%; RCT sample: 23.5%; P = 0.023) and WHO IV (clinical sample: 23.4%; RCT sample: 8.6%; P < 0.001), yet not WHO I and II. Conclusion:. Our findings suggest a disparity between research-based study populations and clinical populations with CPMP. We advocate for future investigations on how to implement robust scientific evidence into real-world clinical practice, with a particular focus on addressing psychiatric comorbidities.http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001216
spellingShingle Helen Koechlin
Cedric Werdelis
Antonia Barke
Beatrice Korwisi
Roland von Känel
Julia Wagner
Cosima Locher
Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
PAIN Reports
title Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
title_full Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
title_fullStr Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
title_short Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice
title_sort pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain disparity between synthesized evidence and real world clinical practice
url http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001216
work_keys_str_mv AT helenkoechlin pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT cedricwerdelis pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT antoniabarke pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT beatricekorwisi pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT rolandvonkanel pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT juliawagner pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice
AT cosimalocher pharmacologicalinterventionsforpatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpaindisparitybetweensynthesizedevidenceandrealworldclinicalpractice