Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana

This paper investigates the geopolitical context of the emergence of “suicide terrorism” to propose that terrorism in its various forms has less to do with religious ideologies in general and with Islamic faith in particular, and more to do with the colonial and neocolonial politics of Empire in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmoud Arghavan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Association for American Studies 2020-09-01
Series:European Journal of American Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/16223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558282405150720
author Mahmoud Arghavan
author_facet Mahmoud Arghavan
author_sort Mahmoud Arghavan
collection DOAJ
description This paper investigates the geopolitical context of the emergence of “suicide terrorism” to propose that terrorism in its various forms has less to do with religious ideologies in general and with Islamic faith in particular, and more to do with the colonial and neocolonial politics of Empire in the colonies, postcolonies and occupied territories by the U.S. army and its allies in the Middle East in the post-9/11 era. Two representations of the figure of the suicide terrorist will be analyzed as they are presented in the narratives suggested in the Showtime series Homeland (2011-) and the film Syriana (2005). I argue that even though the Islamicate world and Muslims in the post-9/11 era have generally been portrayed in a differentiated fashion, these media productions have had almost the same effects on the public as earlier Orientalist productions. Although they appear to endorse antiracism and multiculturalism on the surface, these current narratives simultaneously produce what Evelyn Alsultany calls “the logics and affects necessary to legitimize racist policies and practices” (Alsultany 162). A “dialectical Islamophobia” (Beydoun 40) that is at play in the West and Western media productions legitimizes and values imperialist necropolitics while delegitimizing its opponent, namely the religious necropolitics of suicide terrorism.
format Article
id doaj-art-cb5fdf9f78904373badc17d5db71c84c
institution Kabale University
issn 1991-9336
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher European Association for American Studies
record_format Article
series European Journal of American Studies
spelling doaj-art-cb5fdf9f78904373badc17d5db71c84c2025-01-06T09:09:07ZengEuropean Association for American StudiesEuropean Journal of American Studies1991-93362020-09-0115310.4000/ejas.16223Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and SyrianaMahmoud ArghavanThis paper investigates the geopolitical context of the emergence of “suicide terrorism” to propose that terrorism in its various forms has less to do with religious ideologies in general and with Islamic faith in particular, and more to do with the colonial and neocolonial politics of Empire in the colonies, postcolonies and occupied territories by the U.S. army and its allies in the Middle East in the post-9/11 era. Two representations of the figure of the suicide terrorist will be analyzed as they are presented in the narratives suggested in the Showtime series Homeland (2011-) and the film Syriana (2005). I argue that even though the Islamicate world and Muslims in the post-9/11 era have generally been portrayed in a differentiated fashion, these media productions have had almost the same effects on the public as earlier Orientalist productions. Although they appear to endorse antiracism and multiculturalism on the surface, these current narratives simultaneously produce what Evelyn Alsultany calls “the logics and affects necessary to legitimize racist policies and practices” (Alsultany 162). A “dialectical Islamophobia” (Beydoun 40) that is at play in the West and Western media productions legitimizes and values imperialist necropolitics while delegitimizing its opponent, namely the religious necropolitics of suicide terrorism.https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/16223OrientalismIslamophobiaNecropoliticsNew TerrorismSuicide Terrorist“War on Terror”
spellingShingle Mahmoud Arghavan
Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
European Journal of American Studies
Orientalism
Islamophobia
Necropolitics
New Terrorism
Suicide Terrorist
“War on Terror”
title Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
title_full Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
title_fullStr Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
title_full_unstemmed Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
title_short Islamophobia without Islamophobes: New Strategies of Representing Imperialist versus Suicide Terrorist Necropolitics in Homeland and Syriana
title_sort islamophobia without islamophobes new strategies of representing imperialist versus suicide terrorist necropolitics in homeland and syriana
topic Orientalism
Islamophobia
Necropolitics
New Terrorism
Suicide Terrorist
“War on Terror”
url https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/16223
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudarghavan islamophobiawithoutislamophobesnewstrategiesofrepresentingimperialistversussuicideterroristnecropoliticsinhomelandandsyriana