Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study

Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared without anticoagulants having improved features such as increased fibroblast migration, proliferation, and tissue angiogenesis acceleration. When administered to titanium implants, i-PRF clings to the metal surface, generating a protein...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shivam Singh, Yasir S. Khan, Amitabh Srivastava, Vivek Srivastava, Ajita Meenawat, Tanu Sahney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1179_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543493102600192
author Shivam Singh
Yasir S. Khan
Amitabh Srivastava
Vivek Srivastava
Ajita Meenawat
Tanu Sahney
author_facet Shivam Singh
Yasir S. Khan
Amitabh Srivastava
Vivek Srivastava
Ajita Meenawat
Tanu Sahney
author_sort Shivam Singh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared without anticoagulants having improved features such as increased fibroblast migration, proliferation, and tissue angiogenesis acceleration. When administered to titanium implants, i-PRF clings to the metal surface, generating a protein coating that impacts cellular activity required for osseointegration which aids in optimum and rapid osseointegration. The present study compared and evaluated the osteogenic properties of i-PRF in dental implant sites to determine the positive impact of i-PRF on osseointegration. Methods: A split-mouth clinical study design was used, involving ten participants with twenty sites of bilaterally missing mandibular molars. The subjects were divided into two equal treatment groups (N = 10): control group, where dental implants were placed without i-PRF activation, and test group, where i-PRF-activated dental implants were placed. Results: Both groups showed similar trends in plaque index and sulcular bleeding index. However, the test group exhibited significantly higher Implant Stability Quotient scores, indicating better stability. Peri-implant probing depth showed no significant difference between groups, but the test group had lower increase in probing depth. In addition, the test group showed superior wound healing and lower crestal bone loss changes compared to the control group. Conclusions: The findings of this study contributed to understand the effectiveness of i-PRF in enhancing osseointegration in dental implants, potentially improving clinical outcomes in implant dentistry.
format Article
id doaj-art-c97d0b49af524446ad1e9581b639f135
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-c97d0b49af524446ad1e9581b639f1352025-01-13T10:23:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3737S373910.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1179_24Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical StudyShivam SinghYasir S. KhanAmitabh SrivastavaVivek SrivastavaAjita MeenawatTanu SahneyBackground: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared without anticoagulants having improved features such as increased fibroblast migration, proliferation, and tissue angiogenesis acceleration. When administered to titanium implants, i-PRF clings to the metal surface, generating a protein coating that impacts cellular activity required for osseointegration which aids in optimum and rapid osseointegration. The present study compared and evaluated the osteogenic properties of i-PRF in dental implant sites to determine the positive impact of i-PRF on osseointegration. Methods: A split-mouth clinical study design was used, involving ten participants with twenty sites of bilaterally missing mandibular molars. The subjects were divided into two equal treatment groups (N = 10): control group, where dental implants were placed without i-PRF activation, and test group, where i-PRF-activated dental implants were placed. Results: Both groups showed similar trends in plaque index and sulcular bleeding index. However, the test group exhibited significantly higher Implant Stability Quotient scores, indicating better stability. Peri-implant probing depth showed no significant difference between groups, but the test group had lower increase in probing depth. In addition, the test group showed superior wound healing and lower crestal bone loss changes compared to the control group. Conclusions: The findings of this study contributed to understand the effectiveness of i-PRF in enhancing osseointegration in dental implants, potentially improving clinical outcomes in implant dentistry.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1179_24dental implantsinjectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-prf)osseointegration
spellingShingle Shivam Singh
Yasir S. Khan
Amitabh Srivastava
Vivek Srivastava
Ajita Meenawat
Tanu Sahney
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
dental implants
injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-prf)
osseointegration
title Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Following Delayed Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Region with or without i-PRF Activation: A Split Mouth Clinical Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular posterior region with or without i prf activation a split mouth clinical study
topic dental implants
injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-prf)
osseointegration
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1179_24
work_keys_str_mv AT shivamsingh comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy
AT yasirskhan comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy
AT amitabhsrivastava comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy
AT viveksrivastava comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy
AT ajitameenawat comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy
AT tanusahney comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicchangesfollowingdelayedimplantplacementinmandibularposteriorregionwithorwithoutiprfactivationasplitmouthclinicalstudy