Improved visualization of virtual-assisted lung mapping by indocyanine greenCentral MessagePerspective
Objectives: Virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) is a bronchoscopic marking method of dye application on the surface of the lungs before resecting nonpalpable nodules. However, in some cases, it can be difficult to identify the markings of VAL-MAP on computed tomography and intraoperative thoraco...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | JTCVS Techniques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250721004983 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objectives: Virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) is a bronchoscopic marking method of dye application on the surface of the lungs before resecting nonpalpable nodules. However, in some cases, it can be difficult to identify the markings of VAL-MAP on computed tomography and intraoperative thoracoscopy. We developed and assessed the feasibility of indocyanine green VAL-MAP (ICG-VAL-MAP). Methods: A historical control trial was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of ICG-VAL-MAP for marking visualization compared with that of VAL-MAP. In ICG-VAL-MAP, instead of indigo carmine, ICG and computed tomography contrast agents were used for dye marking, and near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy was employed to visualize the ICG markings. The other processes in VAL-MAP were carried out. The marking visibility was assessed in 3 grades of easy, faint, or not identifiable. We compared the visibility of the markings on computed tomography images and during thoracoscopic operations between VAL-MAP (567 markings in 147 cases) and ICG-VAL-MAP (142 markings in 63 cases). Results: On the preoperative computed tomography images, ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better marking visualization than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 142/0/0 vs 427/100/30; P < .0001). ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better intraoperative markings than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 141/0/1, respectively, vs 475/50/42, respectively; P < .0001). Regarding complications, pneumothorax occurred in 8 (5.4%) cases of VAL-MAP and zero cases (0%) of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .12); fever was observed in 7 (5.0%) cases of VAL-MAP and 2 (3.2%) cases of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .72). Conclusions: ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better visibility of markings than VAL-MAP. It might be useful in the resection of nonpalpable small lung lesions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2666-2507 |