PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’

Roman law accorded a broad scope of protection for public places. Te magistrates responsible for securing it were the curule and plebeian aediles, the censors, and the praetors. Praetors conducted this duty by promulgating interdicts. Ne quid in loco publico fat, which prohibited any activity or in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Renata Kamińska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2018-05-01
Series:Zeszyty Prawnicze
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/2430
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846155086162558976
author Renata Kamińska
author_facet Renata Kamińska
author_sort Renata Kamińska
collection DOAJ
description Roman law accorded a broad scope of protection for public places. Te magistrates responsible for securing it were the curule and plebeian aediles, the censors, and the praetors. Praetors conducted this duty by promulgating interdicts. Ne quid in loco publico fat, which prohibited any activity or installation in a public place which could cause damage, stands out among the other praetorian interdicts. What made it special was that it could be applied both when the potential damage concerned the public interest (utilitas publica), and/or the interest of a private individual (utilitas privata). The damage (damnum) was defned as the loss of a beneft of whatsoever kind the private individual drew from his enjoyment of the public place in question.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7e36bcde3014a2197cf0f11944e646c
institution Kabale University
issn 1643-8183
2353-8139
language English
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Zeszyty Prawnicze
spelling doaj-art-c7e36bcde3014a2197cf0f11944e646c2024-11-26T17:00:28ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieZeszyty Prawnicze1643-81832353-81392018-05-0117410.21697/zp.2017.17.4.09PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’Renata Kamińska Roman law accorded a broad scope of protection for public places. Te magistrates responsible for securing it were the curule and plebeian aediles, the censors, and the praetors. Praetors conducted this duty by promulgating interdicts. Ne quid in loco publico fat, which prohibited any activity or installation in a public place which could cause damage, stands out among the other praetorian interdicts. What made it special was that it could be applied both when the potential damage concerned the public interest (utilitas publica), and/or the interest of a private individual (utilitas privata). The damage (damnum) was defned as the loss of a beneft of whatsoever kind the private individual drew from his enjoyment of the public place in question. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/2430public placeinterdictutilitas publicautilitas privatadamage
spellingShingle Renata Kamińska
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
Zeszyty Prawnicze
public place
interdict
utilitas publica
utilitas privata
damage
title PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
title_full PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
title_fullStr PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
title_full_unstemmed PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
title_short PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST IN THE ‘INTERDICTUM NE QUID IN LOCO PUBLICO FIAT’
title_sort private and public interest in the interdictum ne quid in loco publico fiat
topic public place
interdict
utilitas publica
utilitas privata
damage
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/2430
work_keys_str_mv AT renatakaminska privateandpublicinterestintheinterdictumnequidinlocopublicofiat