Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif

The author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gilles Gauthier
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université Laval 2012-11-01
Series:Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841553229929775104
author Gilles Gauthier
author_facet Gilles Gauthier
author_sort Gilles Gauthier
collection DOAJ
description The author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six constituents of the extended concept of eristic are identified and analyzed : the intensification of a superficial or marginal opposition, the wording of the question, murky theorization, one’s positioning with regard to one’s opponent, the use of strategic arguments and the taking into account of peripheral contextual elements.
format Article
id doaj-art-c772011e903c4134b8a05839d1f7700a
institution Kabale University
issn 1189-3788
1920-7344
language fra
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher Université Laval
record_format Article
series Communication
spelling doaj-art-c772011e903c4134b8a05839d1f7700a2025-01-09T11:27:10ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442012-11-0130210.4000/communication.3570Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatifGilles GauthierThe author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six constituents of the extended concept of eristic are identified and analyzed : the intensification of a superficial or marginal opposition, the wording of the question, murky theorization, one’s positioning with regard to one’s opponent, the use of strategic arguments and the taking into account of peripheral contextual elements.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570argumentationeristicdebatepublic reasonconfrontation
spellingShingle Gilles Gauthier
Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
Communication
argumentation
eristic
debate
public reason
confrontation
title Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
title_full Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
title_fullStr Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
title_full_unstemmed Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
title_short Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
title_sort le cadre eristique du debat argumentatif
topic argumentation
eristic
debate
public reason
confrontation
url https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570
work_keys_str_mv AT gillesgauthier lecadreeristiquedudebatargumentatif