Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif
The author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université Laval
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841553229929775104 |
---|---|
author | Gilles Gauthier |
author_facet | Gilles Gauthier |
author_sort | Gilles Gauthier |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six constituents of the extended concept of eristic are identified and analyzed : the intensification of a superficial or marginal opposition, the wording of the question, murky theorization, one’s positioning with regard to one’s opponent, the use of strategic arguments and the taking into account of peripheral contextual elements. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-c772011e903c4134b8a05839d1f7700a |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1189-3788 1920-7344 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2012-11-01 |
publisher | Université Laval |
record_format | Article |
series | Communication |
spelling | doaj-art-c772011e903c4134b8a05839d1f7700a2025-01-09T11:27:10ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442012-11-0130210.4000/communication.3570Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatifGilles GauthierThe author claims that public debates are no longer authentic argumentative exchanges because of the eristic frame in which they are held. The concept is borrowed from Schopenhauer but given a wider extension than that of a discursive process. With the aid of the Quebecois debate on secularism, six constituents of the extended concept of eristic are identified and analyzed : the intensification of a superficial or marginal opposition, the wording of the question, murky theorization, one’s positioning with regard to one’s opponent, the use of strategic arguments and the taking into account of peripheral contextual elements.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570argumentationeristicdebatepublic reasonconfrontation |
spellingShingle | Gilles Gauthier Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif Communication argumentation eristic debate public reason confrontation |
title | Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif |
title_full | Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif |
title_fullStr | Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif |
title_full_unstemmed | Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif |
title_short | Le cadre éristique du débat argumentatif |
title_sort | le cadre eristique du debat argumentatif |
topic | argumentation eristic debate public reason confrontation |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/3570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillesgauthier lecadreeristiquedudebatargumentatif |