Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models

Abstract Background Healthcare use by High-Need High-Cost (HNHC) patients is believed to be modifiable through better coordination of care. To identify patients for care management, a hybrid approach is recommended that combines clinical assessment of need with model-based prediction of cost. Models...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ursula W. de Ruijter, Z. L. Rana Kaplan, Frank Eijkenaar, Carolien C. H. M. Maas, Agnes van der Heide, Willem A. Bax, Hester F. Lingsma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11936-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846147990157262848
author Ursula W. de Ruijter
Z. L. Rana Kaplan
Frank Eijkenaar
Carolien C. H. M. Maas
Agnes van der Heide
Willem A. Bax
Hester F. Lingsma
author_facet Ursula W. de Ruijter
Z. L. Rana Kaplan
Frank Eijkenaar
Carolien C. H. M. Maas
Agnes van der Heide
Willem A. Bax
Hester F. Lingsma
author_sort Ursula W. de Ruijter
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Healthcare use by High-Need High-Cost (HNHC) patients is believed to be modifiable through better coordination of care. To identify patients for care management, a hybrid approach is recommended that combines clinical assessment of need with model-based prediction of cost. Models that predict high healthcare costs persisting over time are relevant but scarce. We aimed to develop and validate two models predicting Persistent High-Cost (PHC) status upon hospital outpatient visit and hospital admission, respectively. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using claims data from a national health insurer in the Netherlands—a regulated competitive health care system with universal coverage. We created two populations of adults based on their index event in 2016: a first hospital outpatient visit (i.e., outpatient population) or hospital admission (i.e., hospital admission population). Both were divided in a development (January-June) and validation (July-December) cohort. Our outcome of interest, PHC status, was defined as belonging to the top 10% of total annual healthcare costs for three consecutive years after the index event. Predictors were predefined based on an earlier systematic review and collected in the year prior to the index event. Predictor effects were quantified through logistic multivariable regression analysis. To increase usability, we also developed smaller models containing the lowest number of predictors while maintaining comparable performance. This was based on relative predictor importance (Wald χ2). Model performance was evaluated by means of discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (plots). Results In the outpatient development cohort (n = 135,558), 2.2% of patients (n = 3,016) was PHC. In the hospital admission development cohort (n = 24,805), this was 5.8% (n = 1,451). Both full models included 27 predictors, while their smaller counterparts had 10 (outpatient model) and 11 predictors (hospital admission model). In the outpatient validation cohort (n = 84,009) and hospital admission validation cohort (n = 20,768), discrimination was good for full models (C-statistics 0.75; 0.74) and smaller models (C-statistics 0.70; 0.73), while calibration plots indicated that models were well-calibrated. Conclusions We developed and validated two models predicting PHC status that demonstrate good discrimination and calibration. Both models are suitable for integration into electronic health records to aid a hybrid case-finding strategy for HNHC care management.
format Article
id doaj-art-c645f63eb9d84d60ad1ead900e8a6a75
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6963
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj-art-c645f63eb9d84d60ad1ead900e8a6a752024-12-01T12:15:36ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632024-11-0124111110.1186/s12913-024-11936-7Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction modelsUrsula W. de Ruijter0Z. L. Rana Kaplan1Frank Eijkenaar2Carolien C. H. M. Maas3Agnes van der Heide4Willem A. Bax5Hester F. Lingsma6Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical CenterErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical CenterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Northwest ClinicsDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical CenterAbstract Background Healthcare use by High-Need High-Cost (HNHC) patients is believed to be modifiable through better coordination of care. To identify patients for care management, a hybrid approach is recommended that combines clinical assessment of need with model-based prediction of cost. Models that predict high healthcare costs persisting over time are relevant but scarce. We aimed to develop and validate two models predicting Persistent High-Cost (PHC) status upon hospital outpatient visit and hospital admission, respectively. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using claims data from a national health insurer in the Netherlands—a regulated competitive health care system with universal coverage. We created two populations of adults based on their index event in 2016: a first hospital outpatient visit (i.e., outpatient population) or hospital admission (i.e., hospital admission population). Both were divided in a development (January-June) and validation (July-December) cohort. Our outcome of interest, PHC status, was defined as belonging to the top 10% of total annual healthcare costs for three consecutive years after the index event. Predictors were predefined based on an earlier systematic review and collected in the year prior to the index event. Predictor effects were quantified through logistic multivariable regression analysis. To increase usability, we also developed smaller models containing the lowest number of predictors while maintaining comparable performance. This was based on relative predictor importance (Wald χ2). Model performance was evaluated by means of discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (plots). Results In the outpatient development cohort (n = 135,558), 2.2% of patients (n = 3,016) was PHC. In the hospital admission development cohort (n = 24,805), this was 5.8% (n = 1,451). Both full models included 27 predictors, while their smaller counterparts had 10 (outpatient model) and 11 predictors (hospital admission model). In the outpatient validation cohort (n = 84,009) and hospital admission validation cohort (n = 20,768), discrimination was good for full models (C-statistics 0.75; 0.74) and smaller models (C-statistics 0.70; 0.73), while calibration plots indicated that models were well-calibrated. Conclusions We developed and validated two models predicting PHC status that demonstrate good discrimination and calibration. Both models are suitable for integration into electronic health records to aid a hybrid case-finding strategy for HNHC care management.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11936-7PrognosisMeaningful useHealth expendituresManaged care programsValue-based health care
spellingShingle Ursula W. de Ruijter
Z. L. Rana Kaplan
Frank Eijkenaar
Carolien C. H. M. Maas
Agnes van der Heide
Willem A. Bax
Hester F. Lingsma
Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
BMC Health Services Research
Prognosis
Meaningful use
Health expenditures
Managed care programs
Value-based health care
title Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
title_full Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
title_fullStr Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
title_full_unstemmed Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
title_short Identifying persistent high-cost patients in the hospital for care management: development and validation of prediction models
title_sort identifying persistent high cost patients in the hospital for care management development and validation of prediction models
topic Prognosis
Meaningful use
Health expenditures
Managed care programs
Value-based health care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11936-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ursulawderuijter identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT zlranakaplan identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT frankeijkenaar identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT carolienchmmaas identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT agnesvanderheide identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT willemabax identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels
AT hesterflingsma identifyingpersistenthighcostpatientsinthehospitalforcaremanagementdevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionmodels