Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison

Objective: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJa) is a distressing condition, but can be surgically managed by gap or interpositional arthroplasty, with an aim to restore joint function and prevent re-ankylosis. The aim of this paper is to compare two interposition materials used in management of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumit Gupta, Hemant Gupta, Shadab Mohammad, Hemant Mehra, Subodh Shankar Natu, Niharika Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-05-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500130X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846159705382060032
author Sumit Gupta
Hemant Gupta
Shadab Mohammad
Hemant Mehra
Subodh Shankar Natu
Niharika Gupta
author_facet Sumit Gupta
Hemant Gupta
Shadab Mohammad
Hemant Mehra
Subodh Shankar Natu
Niharika Gupta
author_sort Sumit Gupta
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJa) is a distressing condition, but can be surgically managed by gap or interpositional arthroplasty, with an aim to restore joint function and prevent re-ankylosis. The aim of this paper is to compare two interposition materials used in management of TMJ ankylosis. Methods: 15 patients with TMJa were randomly allocated to two groups: group A (n = 6), interposition material used was medical-grade silicon elastomer, and group B (n = 9) where the interposition material used was temporalis fascia. Patients were followed up at regular intervals of 1 and 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months and were assessed on following parameters: pain by VAS Scale, maximal mouth opening (MMO), implant rejection, and recurrence. Results: The results showed a loss of 4.6% and 7.9% in maximal interincisal mouth opening at 3rd and 6th months in Group A while Group B had a mean loss of 9% and 10% at 3rd and 6th months respectively without any significant difference. None of our cases showed recurrence or implant rejection. Conclusion: We conclude that silicone is comparable to temporalis fascia in terms of stability, surgical ease, and adaptability. It not only restores the function of mandible and ensures good maximum interincisal opening but also maintains the vertical ramal height. Also, it requires less operating time and is easy to handle but is not economical. It might be an effective way to restore function and prevent re-ankylosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-c641474777cd4dbd803236b6caad230c
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-c641474777cd4dbd803236b6caad230c2024-11-23T06:26:55ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682016-05-0162107110Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparisonSumit Gupta0Hemant Gupta1Shadab Mohammad2Hemant Mehra3Subodh Shankar Natu4Niharika Gupta5Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India; Corresponding author.Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, IndiaDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, KGMU, Lucknow, UP, IndiaDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, IndiaDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, IndiaDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, IndiaObjective: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJa) is a distressing condition, but can be surgically managed by gap or interpositional arthroplasty, with an aim to restore joint function and prevent re-ankylosis. The aim of this paper is to compare two interposition materials used in management of TMJ ankylosis. Methods: 15 patients with TMJa were randomly allocated to two groups: group A (n = 6), interposition material used was medical-grade silicon elastomer, and group B (n = 9) where the interposition material used was temporalis fascia. Patients were followed up at regular intervals of 1 and 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months and were assessed on following parameters: pain by VAS Scale, maximal mouth opening (MMO), implant rejection, and recurrence. Results: The results showed a loss of 4.6% and 7.9% in maximal interincisal mouth opening at 3rd and 6th months in Group A while Group B had a mean loss of 9% and 10% at 3rd and 6th months respectively without any significant difference. None of our cases showed recurrence or implant rejection. Conclusion: We conclude that silicone is comparable to temporalis fascia in terms of stability, surgical ease, and adaptability. It not only restores the function of mandible and ensures good maximum interincisal opening but also maintains the vertical ramal height. Also, it requires less operating time and is easy to handle but is not economical. It might be an effective way to restore function and prevent re-ankylosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500130XSiliconeTemporalis fasciaTMJ ankylosisInterposition arthroplasty
spellingShingle Sumit Gupta
Hemant Gupta
Shadab Mohammad
Hemant Mehra
Subodh Shankar Natu
Niharika Gupta
Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Silicone
Temporalis fascia
TMJ ankylosis
Interposition arthroplasty
title Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
title_full Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
title_fullStr Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
title_full_unstemmed Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
title_short Silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in TMJ ankylosis: A comparison
title_sort silicone vs temporalis fascia interposition in tmj ankylosis a comparison
topic Silicone
Temporalis fascia
TMJ ankylosis
Interposition arthroplasty
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500130X
work_keys_str_mv AT sumitgupta siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison
AT hemantgupta siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison
AT shadabmohammad siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison
AT hemantmehra siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison
AT subodhshankarnatu siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison
AT niharikagupta siliconevstemporalisfasciainterpositionintmjankylosisacomparison