Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review
Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest‐holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as fo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1444 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846100277496643584 |
|---|---|
| author | Lyubov Lytvyn Jennifer Petkovic Joanne Khabsa Olivia Magwood Pauline Campbell Ian D. Graham Kevin Pottie Julia Bidonde Heather Limburg Danielle Pollock Elie A. Akl Thomas W. Concannon Peter Tugwell |
| author_facet | Lyubov Lytvyn Jennifer Petkovic Joanne Khabsa Olivia Magwood Pauline Campbell Ian D. Graham Kevin Pottie Julia Bidonde Heather Limburg Danielle Pollock Elie A. Akl Thomas W. Concannon Peter Tugwell |
| author_sort | Lyubov Lytvyn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest‐holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as follows: (1) What are the empirical examples of impact on the process in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN‐McMaster checklist? (2) What are the empirical examples of impact on the content in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN‐McMaster checklist? |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c61b2c999cac4cf8bea6ac46e80f64ac |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1891-1803 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
| spelling | doaj-art-c61b2c999cac4cf8bea6ac46e80f64ac2024-12-30T11:10:29ZengWileyCampbell Systematic Reviews1891-18032024-12-01204n/an/a10.1002/cl2.1444Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic reviewLyubov Lytvyn0Jennifer Petkovic1Joanne Khabsa2Olivia Magwood3Pauline Campbell4Ian D. Graham5Kevin Pottie6Julia Bidonde7Heather Limburg8Danielle Pollock9Elie A. Akl10Thomas W. Concannon11Peter Tugwell12Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario CanadaBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Clinical Research Institute Beirut LebanonC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyere Research Institute Ottawa Ontario CanadaNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UKSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaFamily Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia CanadaNorwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo NorwayPublic Health Agency of Canada Ottawa Ontario CanadaUniversity of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia AustraliaDepartment of Internal Medicine American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut LebanonThe RAND Corporation Boston Massachusetts USAClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario CanadaAbstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest‐holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as follows: (1) What are the empirical examples of impact on the process in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN‐McMaster checklist? (2) What are the empirical examples of impact on the content in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN‐McMaster checklist?https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1444engagementguidelinesimpactpatient and public involvementstakeholder |
| spellingShingle | Lyubov Lytvyn Jennifer Petkovic Joanne Khabsa Olivia Magwood Pauline Campbell Ian D. Graham Kevin Pottie Julia Bidonde Heather Limburg Danielle Pollock Elie A. Akl Thomas W. Concannon Peter Tugwell Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review Campbell Systematic Reviews engagement guidelines impact patient and public involvement stakeholder |
| title | Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review |
| title_full | Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review |
| title_short | Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest‐holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review |
| title_sort | protocol assessing the impact of interest holder engagement on guideline development a systematic review |
| topic | engagement guidelines impact patient and public involvement stakeholder |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1444 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lyubovlytvyn protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT jenniferpetkovic protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT joannekhabsa protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT oliviamagwood protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT paulinecampbell protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT iandgraham protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT kevinpottie protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT juliabidonde protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT heatherlimburg protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT daniellepollock protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT elieaakl protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT thomaswconcannon protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview AT petertugwell protocolassessingtheimpactofinterestholderengagementonguidelinedevelopmentasystematicreview |