Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?

IntroductionFreezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling symptom for people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Turning on the spot for one minute in alternating directions (360 turn) while performing a cognitive dual-task (DT) is a fast and sensitive way to provoke FOG. The FOG-index is a widely used wearabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maaike Goris, Pieter Ginis, Clint Hansen, Christian Schlenstedt, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Nicholas D’Cruz, Wim Vandenberghe, Walter Maetzler, Alice Nieuwboer, Moran Gilat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1508800/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555705154240512
author Maaike Goris
Pieter Ginis
Clint Hansen
Christian Schlenstedt
Christian Schlenstedt
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Nicholas D’Cruz
Wim Vandenberghe
Wim Vandenberghe
Walter Maetzler
Alice Nieuwboer
Moran Gilat
author_facet Maaike Goris
Pieter Ginis
Clint Hansen
Christian Schlenstedt
Christian Schlenstedt
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Nicholas D’Cruz
Wim Vandenberghe
Wim Vandenberghe
Walter Maetzler
Alice Nieuwboer
Moran Gilat
author_sort Maaike Goris
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionFreezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling symptom for people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Turning on the spot for one minute in alternating directions (360 turn) while performing a cognitive dual-task (DT) is a fast and sensitive way to provoke FOG. The FOG-index is a widely used wearable sensor-based algorithm to quantify FOG severity during turning. Despite that, the FOG-index’s classification performance and criterion validity is not tested against the gold standard (i.e., video-rated time spent freezing). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the FOG-index’s classification performance and criterion validity to assess FOG severity during 360 turn. Additionally, we investigated the FOG-index’s optimal cutoff values to differentiate between PwPD with and without FOG.Methods164 PwPD self-reported the presence of FOG on the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) and performed the DT 360 turn in the ON medication state while being videoed and wearing five wearable sensors. Two independent clinical experts rated FOG on video. ROC-AUC values assessed the FOG-index’s classification accuracy against self-reported FOG and expert ratings. Spearman-rho was used to evaluate the correlation between expert and FOG-index ratings of FOG severity.ResultsTwenty-eight patients self-reported FOG, while 104 were classified as a freezer by the experts. The FOG-index had limited classification agreement with the NFOGQ (AUC = 0.60, p = 0.115, sensitivity 46.4%, specificity 72.8%) and the experts (AUC = 0.65, p < 0.001, sensitivity 68.3%, specificity 61.7%). Only weak correlations were found between the algorithm outputs and expert ratings for FOG severity (rho = 0.13–0.38).ConclusionA surprisingly large discrepancy was found between self-reported and expert-rated FOG during the 360 turning task, indicating PwPD do not always notice FOG in daily life. The FOG-index achieved suboptimal classification performance and poor criterion validity to assess FOG severity. Regardless, 360 turning proved a sensitive task to elicit FOG. Further development of the FOG-index is warranted, and long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess the predictive value of the 360 turning task for classifying FOG conversion.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5dcbbca40794738a69c12527812e9a3
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-2295
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj-art-c5dcbbca40794738a69c12527812e9a32025-01-08T05:10:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952025-01-011510.3389/fneur.2024.15088001508800Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?Maaike Goris0Pieter Ginis1Clint Hansen2Christian Schlenstedt3Christian Schlenstedt4Jeffrey M. Hausdorff5Jeffrey M. Hausdorff6Jeffrey M. Hausdorff7Nicholas D’Cruz8Wim Vandenberghe9Wim Vandenberghe10Walter Maetzler11Alice Nieuwboer12Moran Gilat13Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, GermanyInstitute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition, and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, IsraelRush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Medical College, Chigaco, IL, United StatesDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Parkinson Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumIntroductionFreezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling symptom for people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Turning on the spot for one minute in alternating directions (360 turn) while performing a cognitive dual-task (DT) is a fast and sensitive way to provoke FOG. The FOG-index is a widely used wearable sensor-based algorithm to quantify FOG severity during turning. Despite that, the FOG-index’s classification performance and criterion validity is not tested against the gold standard (i.e., video-rated time spent freezing). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the FOG-index’s classification performance and criterion validity to assess FOG severity during 360 turn. Additionally, we investigated the FOG-index’s optimal cutoff values to differentiate between PwPD with and without FOG.Methods164 PwPD self-reported the presence of FOG on the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) and performed the DT 360 turn in the ON medication state while being videoed and wearing five wearable sensors. Two independent clinical experts rated FOG on video. ROC-AUC values assessed the FOG-index’s classification accuracy against self-reported FOG and expert ratings. Spearman-rho was used to evaluate the correlation between expert and FOG-index ratings of FOG severity.ResultsTwenty-eight patients self-reported FOG, while 104 were classified as a freezer by the experts. The FOG-index had limited classification agreement with the NFOGQ (AUC = 0.60, p = 0.115, sensitivity 46.4%, specificity 72.8%) and the experts (AUC = 0.65, p < 0.001, sensitivity 68.3%, specificity 61.7%). Only weak correlations were found between the algorithm outputs and expert ratings for FOG severity (rho = 0.13–0.38).ConclusionA surprisingly large discrepancy was found between self-reported and expert-rated FOG during the 360 turning task, indicating PwPD do not always notice FOG in daily life. The FOG-index achieved suboptimal classification performance and poor criterion validity to assess FOG severity. Regardless, 360 turning proved a sensitive task to elicit FOG. Further development of the FOG-index is warranted, and long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess the predictive value of the 360 turning task for classifying FOG conversion.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1508800/fullParkinson’s diseasefreezing of gaitwearable sensorsaccelerometerturningclassification
spellingShingle Maaike Goris
Pieter Ginis
Clint Hansen
Christian Schlenstedt
Christian Schlenstedt
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Nicholas D’Cruz
Wim Vandenberghe
Wim Vandenberghe
Walter Maetzler
Alice Nieuwboer
Moran Gilat
Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
Frontiers in Neurology
Parkinson’s disease
freezing of gait
wearable sensors
accelerometer
turning
classification
title Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
title_full Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
title_fullStr Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
title_full_unstemmed Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
title_short Is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in Parkinson’s disease?
title_sort is the freezing index a valid outcome to assess freezing of gait during turning in parkinson s disease
topic Parkinson’s disease
freezing of gait
wearable sensors
accelerometer
turning
classification
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1508800/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maaikegoris isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT pieterginis isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT clinthansen isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT christianschlenstedt isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT christianschlenstedt isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT jeffreymhausdorff isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT jeffreymhausdorff isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT jeffreymhausdorff isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT nicholasdcruz isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT wimvandenberghe isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT wimvandenberghe isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT waltermaetzler isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT alicenieuwboer isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease
AT morangilat isthefreezingindexavalidoutcometoassessfreezingofgaitduringturninginparkinsonsdisease