An In Vivo Comparison of Trueness and Precision of Two Novel Methods for Improving Edentulous Full Arch Implant Scanning Accuracy: A Pilot Study
<b>Background:</b> This retrospective in vivo study evaluated the trueness and precision of two digital intraoral scanners—Dentsply Sirona Primescan and Medit i900—, both with and without two variants of the novel Scan Ladder aids, and compared their performance to a new intraoral photog...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Adam Brian Nulty |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Dentistry Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/12/11/367 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Trueness comparison of intraoral scans for diverse arch lengths in pediatric dental models
by: Chin-Yun Pan, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Case Report: Accuracy analysis of a new scanning body for intraoral digital impressions in full-arch edentulous patients
by: Hongyang Ma, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Evaluating the accuracy (precision and trueness) of conventional and digital Intraoral Impression Technique.
by: Lana Shwan Jalal, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Accuracy of Partial and Complete-Arch Conventional Versus Digital Impressions: An In-Vitro Study
by: Jeremy Chieng, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Comparison of conventional and digital impression approaches for edentulous maxilla: clinical study
by: Sinem Kahya Karaca, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)