Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation

Background. To determine predictors of early and late right ventricular failure (RVF) according to transthoracic echocardiography (TTEchoCG) and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Materials and methods. Twenty-three patients with LVAD were in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janna A. Shahramanova, Oleg Yu. Narusov, Maksim I. Makeev, Stanislav M. Smirnov, Elena V. Dzybinskaia, Kamil G. Ganaev, Andrey A. Shiryaev, Irina A. Merkulova, Dmitry V. Pevzner, Marina A. Saidova, Sergey N. Tereshchenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house 2025-01-01
Series:Терапевтический архив
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/645360/194490
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849328705288011776
author Janna A. Shahramanova
Oleg Yu. Narusov
Maksim I. Makeev
Stanislav M. Smirnov
Elena V. Dzybinskaia
Kamil G. Ganaev
Andrey A. Shiryaev
Irina A. Merkulova
Dmitry V. Pevzner
Marina A. Saidova
Sergey N. Tereshchenko
author_facet Janna A. Shahramanova
Oleg Yu. Narusov
Maksim I. Makeev
Stanislav M. Smirnov
Elena V. Dzybinskaia
Kamil G. Ganaev
Andrey A. Shiryaev
Irina A. Merkulova
Dmitry V. Pevzner
Marina A. Saidova
Sergey N. Tereshchenko
author_sort Janna A. Shahramanova
collection DOAJ
description Background. To determine predictors of early and late right ventricular failure (RVF) according to transthoracic echocardiography (TTEchoCG) and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Materials and methods. Twenty-three patients with LVAD were included in the study. Before implantation, all patients underwent TTEchoCG with comprehensive evaluation of the right ventricle (RV) using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and 3D-echocardiography (3D-RVEF), as well as RHC with measurement of standard indices and calculation of pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi). Results. The highest area under the ROC curve was the RV ejection fraction determined by 3D-RVEF (0.841 with 95% CI 0.677–1.006, sensitivity 0.889, specificity 0.786; p0.001) with a cut-off value ≤42% (OR 29.3 with 95% CI 2.6–336.4; p=0.007) and PAPi (area on ROC curve 0.869 with 95% CI 0.503–0.975, sensitivity 0.778, specificity 0.857; p0.001,) with a threshold value ≤2.2 (OR 20 with 95% CI 1.2–333.3; p=0.035). The combination of these parameters was the most accurate prognostic model (sensitivity 0.778, specificity 1). The combination of echocardiographic parameters – 3D-RVEF and systolic velocity of the tricuspid valve fibrous ring according to tissue myocardial Doppler (TMD: S’ml) has similar sensitivity (0.778) and slightly lower specificity (0.929). Conclusion. The optimal independent echocardiographic predictor of early RVF is 3D-RVEF. The combination of 3D-RVEF and PAPi proved to be the most accurate model, but the combination of 3D-RVEF and S’ml-TMD echocardiographic parameters alone is only slightly inferior in specificity, which allows preliminary assessment of the risk of RVF.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5662aa9da8141e5a532d523bd3b10c3
institution Kabale University
issn 0040-3660
2309-5342
language Russian
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house
record_format Article
series Терапевтический архив
spelling doaj-art-c5662aa9da8141e5a532d523bd3b10c32025-08-20T03:47:32Zrus"Consilium Medicum" Publishing houseТерапевтический архив0040-36602309-53422025-01-0197432232810.26442/00403660.2025.04.20316978630Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantationJanna A. Shahramanova0https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9478-9530Oleg Yu. Narusov1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-0950Maksim I. Makeev2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-5088Stanislav M. Smirnov3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-457XElena V. Dzybinskaia4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-442XKamil G. Ganaev5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-2450Andrey A. Shiryaev6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3325-9743Irina A. Merkulova7https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-3422Dmitry V. Pevzner8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-0065Marina A. Saidova9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-1862Sergey N. Tereshchenko10https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-6129Chazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyChazov National Medical Research Center of CardiologyBackground. To determine predictors of early and late right ventricular failure (RVF) according to transthoracic echocardiography (TTEchoCG) and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Materials and methods. Twenty-three patients with LVAD were included in the study. Before implantation, all patients underwent TTEchoCG with comprehensive evaluation of the right ventricle (RV) using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and 3D-echocardiography (3D-RVEF), as well as RHC with measurement of standard indices and calculation of pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi). Results. The highest area under the ROC curve was the RV ejection fraction determined by 3D-RVEF (0.841 with 95% CI 0.677–1.006, sensitivity 0.889, specificity 0.786; p0.001) with a cut-off value ≤42% (OR 29.3 with 95% CI 2.6–336.4; p=0.007) and PAPi (area on ROC curve 0.869 with 95% CI 0.503–0.975, sensitivity 0.778, specificity 0.857; p0.001,) with a threshold value ≤2.2 (OR 20 with 95% CI 1.2–333.3; p=0.035). The combination of these parameters was the most accurate prognostic model (sensitivity 0.778, specificity 1). The combination of echocardiographic parameters – 3D-RVEF and systolic velocity of the tricuspid valve fibrous ring according to tissue myocardial Doppler (TMD: S’ml) has similar sensitivity (0.778) and slightly lower specificity (0.929). Conclusion. The optimal independent echocardiographic predictor of early RVF is 3D-RVEF. The combination of 3D-RVEF and PAPi proved to be the most accurate model, but the combination of 3D-RVEF and S’ml-TMD echocardiographic parameters alone is only slightly inferior in specificity, which allows preliminary assessment of the risk of RVF.https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/645360/194490lvadartificial left ventriclemechanical circulatory supportright ventricular failure
spellingShingle Janna A. Shahramanova
Oleg Yu. Narusov
Maksim I. Makeev
Stanislav M. Smirnov
Elena V. Dzybinskaia
Kamil G. Ganaev
Andrey A. Shiryaev
Irina A. Merkulova
Dmitry V. Pevzner
Marina A. Saidova
Sergey N. Tereshchenko
Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
Терапевтический архив
lvad
artificial left ventricle
mechanical circulatory support
right ventricular failure
title Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
title_full Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
title_fullStr Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
title_short Predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
title_sort predictors of right ventricular failure in patients after left ventricular assist device implantation
topic lvad
artificial left ventricle
mechanical circulatory support
right ventricular failure
url https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/645360/194490
work_keys_str_mv AT jannaashahramanova predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT olegyunarusov predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT maksimimakeev predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT stanislavmsmirnov predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT elenavdzybinskaia predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT kamilgganaev predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT andreyashiryaev predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT irinaamerkulova predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT dmitryvpevzner predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT marinaasaidova predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation
AT sergeyntereshchenko predictorsofrightventricularfailureinpatientsafterleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation