The lack of reproducibility in research: How statistics can endorse results
Scientific research is validated by reproduction of the results, but efforts to reproduce spurious claims drain resources. We focus on one cause of such failure: false positive statistical test results caused by random variability. Classical statistical methods rely on p-values to measure the eviden...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Scott Goddard, Valen Johnson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Catalan |
| Published: |
Universitat de València
2015-04-01
|
| Series: | Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://turia.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/3913 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Basic Statistics for Radiologists: Part 1—Basic Data Interpretation and Inferential Statistics
by: Adarsh Anil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Lower bounds for the expected sample size in the classical and d-posterior statistical problems
by: I.A. Kareev, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Bayesian Models Are More Sensitive than Frequentist Models in Identifying Differences in Small Datasets Comprising Phonetic Data
by: Georgios P. Georgiou
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Testing the Isotropic Cauchy Hypothesis
by: Jihad Fahs, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Bayesian Structure Learning and Sampling of Bayesian Networks with the R Package BiDAG
by: Polina Suter, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)