Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms

Abstract The paper investigates the strengthening of magnetospheric activity related to geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs). We make a list of GMC events using the empirical magnetopause model (Lin et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009ja014235) and hourly averaged OMNI data and find wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. A. Samsonov, Y. V. Bogdanova, G. Branduardi‐Raymont, L. Xu, J. Zhang, D. Sormakov, O. A. Troshichev, C. Forsyth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002704
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536436412612608
author A. A. Samsonov
Y. V. Bogdanova
G. Branduardi‐Raymont
L. Xu
J. Zhang
D. Sormakov
O. A. Troshichev
C. Forsyth
author_facet A. A. Samsonov
Y. V. Bogdanova
G. Branduardi‐Raymont
L. Xu
J. Zhang
D. Sormakov
O. A. Troshichev
C. Forsyth
author_sort A. A. Samsonov
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The paper investigates the strengthening of magnetospheric activity related to geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs). We make a list of GMC events using the empirical magnetopause model (Lin et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009ja014235) and hourly averaged OMNI data and find which solar wind and magnetospheric conditions accompany and follow the GMCs. The GMCs are mostly caused by the impact of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and/or interplanetary shocks often with a strong increase in the density and a moderate increase in velocity. The average solar wind density during the first GMC hour is higher than 20 cm−3 in 70% cases, while the velocity is higher than 500 km/s in 56% cases. The hourly interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) BZ is negative in 87% cases. The average over all events SMU (SML), Kp, and PC indices reach maxima (minima) in 1 h after the GMC beginning, while the delay of the minimum of the Dst index is usually 3–8 h. These average time delays do not depend on the strength of the storms and substorms. The SML (Dst) minimum is less than −500 nT (−30 nT) in the next 24 h in 95% (99%) cases, that is, the GMC events are mostly followed by magnetic storms and substorms. We compare solar wind and magnetospheric conditions for GMCs connected with ICMEs and stream interaction regions (SIRs). Our study confirms that the ICME‐related events are characterized by stronger ring current and auroral activity than the SIR‐related events. The difference might be explained by the different behavior of the solar wind velocity.
format Article
id doaj-art-c49e34de9b1d4edb95bac690e95abba0
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-c49e34de9b1d4edb95bac690e95abba02025-01-14T16:30:36ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-06-01196n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002704Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and SubstormsA. A. Samsonov0Y. V. Bogdanova1G. Branduardi‐Raymont2L. Xu3J. Zhang4D. Sormakov5O. A. Troshichev6C. Forsyth7Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking Surrey UKRAL Space, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Science and Technology Facilities Council Didcot Oxfordshire UKMullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking Surrey UKMullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking Surrey UKMullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking Surrey UKArctic and Antarctic Research Institute St. Petersburg RussiaArctic and Antarctic Research Institute St. Petersburg RussiaMullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking Surrey UKAbstract The paper investigates the strengthening of magnetospheric activity related to geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs). We make a list of GMC events using the empirical magnetopause model (Lin et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009ja014235) and hourly averaged OMNI data and find which solar wind and magnetospheric conditions accompany and follow the GMCs. The GMCs are mostly caused by the impact of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and/or interplanetary shocks often with a strong increase in the density and a moderate increase in velocity. The average solar wind density during the first GMC hour is higher than 20 cm−3 in 70% cases, while the velocity is higher than 500 km/s in 56% cases. The hourly interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) BZ is negative in 87% cases. The average over all events SMU (SML), Kp, and PC indices reach maxima (minima) in 1 h after the GMC beginning, while the delay of the minimum of the Dst index is usually 3–8 h. These average time delays do not depend on the strength of the storms and substorms. The SML (Dst) minimum is less than −500 nT (−30 nT) in the next 24 h in 95% (99%) cases, that is, the GMC events are mostly followed by magnetic storms and substorms. We compare solar wind and magnetospheric conditions for GMCs connected with ICMEs and stream interaction regions (SIRs). Our study confirms that the ICME‐related events are characterized by stronger ring current and auroral activity than the SIR‐related events. The difference might be explained by the different behavior of the solar wind velocity.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002704geosynchronous magnetopause crossingsempirical magnetopause modelsgeostationary orbit
spellingShingle A. A. Samsonov
Y. V. Bogdanova
G. Branduardi‐Raymont
L. Xu
J. Zhang
D. Sormakov
O. A. Troshichev
C. Forsyth
Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
Space Weather
geosynchronous magnetopause crossings
empirical magnetopause models
geostationary orbit
title Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
title_full Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
title_fullStr Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
title_full_unstemmed Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
title_short Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms
title_sort geosynchronous magnetopause crossings and their relationships with magnetic storms and substorms
topic geosynchronous magnetopause crossings
empirical magnetopause models
geostationary orbit
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002704
work_keys_str_mv AT aasamsonov geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT yvbogdanova geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT gbranduardiraymont geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT lxu geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT jzhang geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT dsormakov geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT oatroshichev geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms
AT cforsyth geosynchronousmagnetopausecrossingsandtheirrelationshipswithmagneticstormsandsubstorms