Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki
In its September 13th 2017 decision,1 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided on a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Poland (Sąd Najwyższy) in proceedings between ENEA S.A. (ENEA) and the president of the Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki (Office for the regulatio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Católica Editora
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Market and Competition Law Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/337 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841563945789292544 |
|---|---|
| author | Nevin Alija |
| author_facet | Nevin Alija |
| author_sort | Nevin Alija |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In its September 13th 2017 decision,1 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided on a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Poland (Sąd Najwyższy) in proceedings between ENEA S.A. (ENEA) and the president of the Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki (Office for the regulation of energy, URE) on the imposition by the latter of a financial penalty on ENEA for breach of its obligation to supply electricity produced by cogeneration. The judgment of the Court of Justice follows many decisions of the European Commission and judgments of the EU courts assessing the involvement of State resources in support schemes in energy, particularly with the aim of switching towards more environmentally friendly sources. This case reaffirms that support schemes may, in certain circumstances, fall outside the scope of the EU State aid rules.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c49d1b38a3644ca98d2f3522ca227786 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2184-0008 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Católica Editora |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Market and Competition Law Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-c49d1b38a3644ca98d2f3522ca2277862025-01-02T23:23:37ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082018-04-012110.7559/mclawreview.2018.337Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji EnergetykiNevin Alija0Católica Research Centre for the Future of Law, Católica Global School of Law, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023, Lisbon, Portugal In its September 13th 2017 decision,1 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided on a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Poland (Sąd Najwyższy) in proceedings between ENEA S.A. (ENEA) and the president of the Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki (Office for the regulation of energy, URE) on the imposition by the latter of a financial penalty on ENEA for breach of its obligation to supply electricity produced by cogeneration. The judgment of the Court of Justice follows many decisions of the European Commission and judgments of the EU courts assessing the involvement of State resources in support schemes in energy, particularly with the aim of switching towards more environmentally friendly sources. This case reaffirms that support schemes may, in certain circumstances, fall outside the scope of the EU State aid rules. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/337State resourcesRenewable energySupport schemes |
| spellingShingle | Nevin Alija Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki Market and Competition Law Review State resources Renewable energy Support schemes |
| title | Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki |
| title_full | Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki |
| title_fullStr | Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki |
| title_full_unstemmed | Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki |
| title_short | Support Schemes in Renewable Energy: Commentary to Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2017, ENEA S.A. v. Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki |
| title_sort | support schemes in renewable energy commentary to judgment of the court fifth chamber of 13 september 2017 enea s a v prezes urzedu regulacji energetyki |
| topic | State resources Renewable energy Support schemes |
| url | https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/337 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nevinalija supportschemesinrenewableenergycommentarytojudgmentofthecourtfifthchamberof13september2017eneasavprezesurzeduregulacjienergetyki |