Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes

Drawing on the autobiographies written by twelve “difficult” pupils, the author discusses two psychoanalytical paradigms that are currently used today. The archaeological paradigm, whose aim is to unveil the latent under the manifest, pertains to a logic pointing towards the past. On the other hand,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adela Abella
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ADR Temporalités 2013-07-01
Series:Temporalités
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2465
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846131031341531136
author Adela Abella
author_facet Adela Abella
author_sort Adela Abella
collection DOAJ
description Drawing on the autobiographies written by twelve “difficult” pupils, the author discusses two psychoanalytical paradigms that are currently used today. The archaeological paradigm, whose aim is to unveil the latent under the manifest, pertains to a logic pointing towards the past. On the other hand, the transformative paradigm, which seeks to foster the development of “psychic muscles”, is more akin to the idea of a plurality of possibilities located in the future. The author suggests the need to combine dialectically both paradigms in clinics and in the approach of cultural phenomena, including autobiographies. The ethical problems linked to the intervention of the analyst/interpreter are central.
format Article
id doaj-art-c46406784a404bc886eb770c91254a94
institution Kabale University
issn 1777-9006
2102-5878
language fra
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher ADR Temporalités
record_format Article
series Temporalités
spelling doaj-art-c46406784a404bc886eb770c91254a942024-12-09T15:56:53ZfraADR TemporalitésTemporalités1777-90062102-58782013-07-011710.4000/temporalites.2465Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignesAdela AbellaDrawing on the autobiographies written by twelve “difficult” pupils, the author discusses two psychoanalytical paradigms that are currently used today. The archaeological paradigm, whose aim is to unveil the latent under the manifest, pertains to a logic pointing towards the past. On the other hand, the transformative paradigm, which seeks to foster the development of “psychic muscles”, is more akin to the idea of a plurality of possibilities located in the future. The author suggests the need to combine dialectically both paradigms in clinics and in the approach of cultural phenomena, including autobiographies. The ethical problems linked to the intervention of the analyst/interpreter are central.https://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2465pastpresentfutureautobiographypsychoanalysisparadigm
spellingShingle Adela Abella
Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
Temporalités
past
present
future
autobiography
psychoanalysis
paradigm
title Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
title_full Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
title_fullStr Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
title_full_unstemmed Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
title_short Les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie : dans les lignes et entre les lignes
title_sort les rapports psychanalyse et autobiographie dans les lignes et entre les lignes
topic past
present
future
autobiography
psychoanalysis
paradigm
url https://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2465
work_keys_str_mv AT adelaabella lesrapportspsychanalyseetautobiographiedansleslignesetentreleslignes