An automated device for provoking and capturing wildlife calls
Abstract Some animals exhibit call‐and‐response behaviors that can be exploited to facilitate detection. Traditionally, acoustic surveys that use call‐and‐respond techniques have required an observer's presence to perform the broadcast, record the response, or both events. This can be labor‐int...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | David E. Ausband, Jesse Skrivseth, Michael S. Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2011-12-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.80 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Testing automated howling devices in a wintertime wolf survey
by: Angela Brennan, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Hair of the dog: Obtaining samples from coyotes and wolves noninvasively
by: David E. Ausband, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Gray wolf breeders are more vulnerable to harvest during the breeding season
by: Peter F. Rebholz, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Efficacy of Acoustic Triangulation for Gray Wolves
by: Jordyn R. O'Gara, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Berry Important? Wolf Provisions Pups with Berries in Northern Minnesota
by: Austin T. Homkes, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)