Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis
Abstract Background Recent advances in ultrasound technology have led to widespread adoption of ultrasonic energy devices in liver resections. While various studies have assessed the comparative advantages of ultrasonic devices and traditional clamp-crushing, their findings vary. Moreover, a specifi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03575-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846165214205050880 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhang-neng Yu Liang-liang Xu Lian Li Hua Zhang Yong-yuan Ma Liang Wang Jin-ting Jiang Ming Zhang |
| author_facet | Zhang-neng Yu Liang-liang Xu Lian Li Hua Zhang Yong-yuan Ma Liang Wang Jin-ting Jiang Ming Zhang |
| author_sort | Zhang-neng Yu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Recent advances in ultrasound technology have led to widespread adoption of ultrasonic energy devices in liver resections. While various studies have assessed the comparative advantages of ultrasonic devices and traditional clamp-crushing, their findings vary. Moreover, a specific systematic review on this topic has not yet been conducted. Objectives This study aims to present a comprehensive, up-to-date analysis comparing outcomes between ultrasonic devices and conventional clamp-crushing methods in liver resection, based on currently available literature. Patients and methods We conducted a systematic literature search in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI up to November 2023. Studies that compared the efficacy or safety of ultrasonic devices against traditional clamp-crushing methods in hepatectomy were included. The analysis covered intraoperative outcomes like operating time, blood loss, and transfusion rate, as well as postoperative outcomes such as complication rate, mortality, postoperative bleeding, and bile leakage. Review Manager version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 17.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) were used for data analysis. Results Thirteen studies, involving a total of 1,417 patients (630 using ultrasonic devices and 787 using clamp-crushing methods), were included. The clamp-crush method resulted in a shorter operation time. Contrarily, the ultrasonic device group experienced reduced blood loss and lower transfusion rates. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in mortality or postoperative bleeding between the groups. However, the ultrasonic group had a lower overall complication rate, particularly a reduced incidence of bile leakage. Overall, the ultrasonic devices were associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Conclusions The findings suggest that ultrasonic devices provide better outcomes in hepatectomy compared to traditional clamp-crushing techniques. Nonetheless, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results due to potential heterogeneity and biases. The choice of using ultrasonic devices should consider the surgeon’s experience and individual patient circumstances. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c3ef7966b1824e989dcf2e316c834d53 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1477-7819 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| spelling | doaj-art-c3ef7966b1824e989dcf2e316c834d532024-11-17T12:31:28ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192024-11-0122111210.1186/s12957-024-03575-3Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysisZhang-neng Yu0Liang-liang Xu1Lian Li2Hua Zhang3Yong-yuan Ma4Liang Wang5Jin-ting Jiang6Ming Zhang7Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDivision of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDivision of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan UniversityDivision of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan UniversityDivision of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background Recent advances in ultrasound technology have led to widespread adoption of ultrasonic energy devices in liver resections. While various studies have assessed the comparative advantages of ultrasonic devices and traditional clamp-crushing, their findings vary. Moreover, a specific systematic review on this topic has not yet been conducted. Objectives This study aims to present a comprehensive, up-to-date analysis comparing outcomes between ultrasonic devices and conventional clamp-crushing methods in liver resection, based on currently available literature. Patients and methods We conducted a systematic literature search in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI up to November 2023. Studies that compared the efficacy or safety of ultrasonic devices against traditional clamp-crushing methods in hepatectomy were included. The analysis covered intraoperative outcomes like operating time, blood loss, and transfusion rate, as well as postoperative outcomes such as complication rate, mortality, postoperative bleeding, and bile leakage. Review Manager version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 17.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) were used for data analysis. Results Thirteen studies, involving a total of 1,417 patients (630 using ultrasonic devices and 787 using clamp-crushing methods), were included. The clamp-crush method resulted in a shorter operation time. Contrarily, the ultrasonic device group experienced reduced blood loss and lower transfusion rates. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in mortality or postoperative bleeding between the groups. However, the ultrasonic group had a lower overall complication rate, particularly a reduced incidence of bile leakage. Overall, the ultrasonic devices were associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Conclusions The findings suggest that ultrasonic devices provide better outcomes in hepatectomy compared to traditional clamp-crushing techniques. Nonetheless, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results due to potential heterogeneity and biases. The choice of using ultrasonic devices should consider the surgeon’s experience and individual patient circumstances.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03575-3Liver neoplasmLiver resectionUltrasonicClamp |
| spellingShingle | Zhang-neng Yu Liang-liang Xu Lian Li Hua Zhang Yong-yuan Ma Liang Wang Jin-ting Jiang Ming Zhang Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis World Journal of Surgical Oncology Liver neoplasm Liver resection Ultrasonic Clamp |
| title | Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis |
| title_full | Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis |
| title_short | Comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy: a meta-analysis |
| title_sort | comparison of the outcomes between ultrasonic devices and clamping in hepatectomy a meta analysis |
| topic | Liver neoplasm Liver resection Ultrasonic Clamp |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03575-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangnengyu comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT liangliangxu comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT lianli comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT huazhang comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT yongyuanma comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT liangwang comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT jintingjiang comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis AT mingzhang comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenultrasonicdevicesandclampinginhepatectomyametaanalysis |