Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework

The Yellow River Basin (YRB) faces intense man-land conflicts. However, existing studies rarely focus on the comprehensive and multidimensional development levels in the YRB, and there is a lack of refined county-level studies, making it difficult to fully support the implementation of ecological pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisha Cheng, Li Ma, Jiajun Qiao, Xiaoyue Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1513411/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846117436169912320
author Lisha Cheng
Lisha Cheng
Li Ma
Jiajun Qiao
Jiajun Qiao
Xiaoyue Li
author_facet Lisha Cheng
Lisha Cheng
Li Ma
Jiajun Qiao
Jiajun Qiao
Xiaoyue Li
author_sort Lisha Cheng
collection DOAJ
description The Yellow River Basin (YRB) faces intense man-land conflicts. However, existing studies rarely focus on the comprehensive and multidimensional development levels in the YRB, and there is a lack of refined county-level studies, making it difficult to fully support the implementation of ecological protection and high-quality development strategy in the YRB. Under the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, the spatial distribution, differences, and correlation characteristics of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the YRB are disclosed. This is achieved by comprehensively utilizing geospatial, socio-economic, and other multi-source data in combination with methods such as the entropy weight method, the Theil index, and spatial analysis. Optimal development paths are proposed with a focus on the development types of counties. The findings are as follows: (1) Counties in the YRB have a low overall multidimensional development level, presenting a spatial distribution pattern of “high in the east and low in the west” overall. In terms of each dimension, the average value ranking of lower reach > middle reach > upper reach is observed in each dimension; the exception is the financial dimension (with the ranking of middle reach > lower reach > upper reach). (2) Differences between counties in the development indices vary across different dimensions. The differences in the multidimensional development indices and in the development indices of each dimension (except for the natural dimension) are mainly attributable to differences between counties within each reach. Differences between reaches are non-significant. (3) The multidimensional development levels of counties in the YRB and their development levels in each dimension show strong spatial correlation. And significant counties are mainly identified as LL-type (clusters of low value areas) and HH-type (clusters of high value areas). (4) Depending on the measurement results and advantageous factors of the county multidimensional development index, counties are classified into four development types: weak development type, single-dimension-led development type, potential coordinated development type, and multidimensional coordinated development type. Based on this classification, targeted optimal development paths are proposed with a focus on the specific characteristics of different development types. The research findings can provide effective scientific support for ecological protection and high-quality development in the YRB.
format Article
id doaj-art-c3da9f2a55b04b3ab421a5da1d38b159
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-665X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj-art-c3da9f2a55b04b3ab421a5da1d38b1592024-12-18T11:40:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2024-12-011210.3389/fenvs.2024.15134111513411Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods frameworkLisha Cheng0Lisha Cheng1Li Ma2Jiajun Qiao3Jiajun Qiao4Xiaoyue Li5College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng, ChinaKey Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng, ChinaSchool of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, ChinaCollege of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng, ChinaKey Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng, ChinaKey Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, ChinaThe Yellow River Basin (YRB) faces intense man-land conflicts. However, existing studies rarely focus on the comprehensive and multidimensional development levels in the YRB, and there is a lack of refined county-level studies, making it difficult to fully support the implementation of ecological protection and high-quality development strategy in the YRB. Under the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, the spatial distribution, differences, and correlation characteristics of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the YRB are disclosed. This is achieved by comprehensively utilizing geospatial, socio-economic, and other multi-source data in combination with methods such as the entropy weight method, the Theil index, and spatial analysis. Optimal development paths are proposed with a focus on the development types of counties. The findings are as follows: (1) Counties in the YRB have a low overall multidimensional development level, presenting a spatial distribution pattern of “high in the east and low in the west” overall. In terms of each dimension, the average value ranking of lower reach > middle reach > upper reach is observed in each dimension; the exception is the financial dimension (with the ranking of middle reach > lower reach > upper reach). (2) Differences between counties in the development indices vary across different dimensions. The differences in the multidimensional development indices and in the development indices of each dimension (except for the natural dimension) are mainly attributable to differences between counties within each reach. Differences between reaches are non-significant. (3) The multidimensional development levels of counties in the YRB and their development levels in each dimension show strong spatial correlation. And significant counties are mainly identified as LL-type (clusters of low value areas) and HH-type (clusters of high value areas). (4) Depending on the measurement results and advantageous factors of the county multidimensional development index, counties are classified into four development types: weak development type, single-dimension-led development type, potential coordinated development type, and multidimensional coordinated development type. Based on this classification, targeted optimal development paths are proposed with a focus on the specific characteristics of different development types. The research findings can provide effective scientific support for ecological protection and high-quality development in the YRB.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1513411/fullmultidimensional developmentsustainable livelihoodoptimization pathcountyYellow River Basin
spellingShingle Lisha Cheng
Lisha Cheng
Li Ma
Jiajun Qiao
Jiajun Qiao
Xiaoyue Li
Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
Frontiers in Environmental Science
multidimensional development
sustainable livelihood
optimization path
county
Yellow River Basin
title Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
title_full Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
title_fullStr Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
title_full_unstemmed Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
title_short Measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the Yellow River Basin: based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
title_sort measurement and optimization paths of the multidimensional development levels of counties in the yellow river basin based on the sustainable livelihoods framework
topic multidimensional development
sustainable livelihood
optimization path
county
Yellow River Basin
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1513411/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lishacheng measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework
AT lishacheng measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework
AT lima measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework
AT jiajunqiao measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework
AT jiajunqiao measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework
AT xiaoyueli measurementandoptimizationpathsofthemultidimensionaldevelopmentlevelsofcountiesintheyellowriverbasinbasedonthesustainablelivelihoodsframework