Correction to: Pourali et al., Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial
Saved in:
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01443615.2018.1407064 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Impact of early versus late artificial rupture of membranes during oxytocin induction of labour on the incidence of chorioamnionitis: a randomised controlled trial (ARM trial)
by: Meghan G. Hill, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The effect of oxytocin, sublingual, and intrauterine misoprostol on blood loss in cesarean delivery: A randomized clinical trial
by: Mahdieh Masoumzadeh, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Statement of retraction: a prospective randomised trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Oxytocin Versus Dinoprostone For Labor Induction in Multiparous Women with Unfavorable Cervix
by: Gul Nihal Buyuk, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Induction of labour outcomes in a tertiary hospital: the Ghanaian cervix and misoprostol 25ug (GCAM-25 STUDY)—a cross-sectional study
by: Teresa Aba Mensah, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)