To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material

Background: An inadequate apical seal stands out as a primary cause of disappointment in surgical endodontic procedures. Therefore, the choice of root-end filling material should aim to prevent the leakage of potential contaminants into the periapical tissue. Aim: To evaluate and compare microleakag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinaykumar G. Suryavanshi, Ravi K. Tale, Vivekanand D. Kolvekar, Rashmi Chordiya, P S Amal, B Abijeet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_747_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543490659418112
author Vinaykumar G. Suryavanshi
Ravi K. Tale
Vivekanand D. Kolvekar
Rashmi Chordiya
P S Amal
B Abijeet
author_facet Vinaykumar G. Suryavanshi
Ravi K. Tale
Vivekanand D. Kolvekar
Rashmi Chordiya
P S Amal
B Abijeet
author_sort Vinaykumar G. Suryavanshi
collection DOAJ
description Background: An inadequate apical seal stands out as a primary cause of disappointment in surgical endodontic procedures. Therefore, the choice of root-end filling material should aim to prevent the leakage of potential contaminants into the periapical tissue. Aim: To evaluate and compare microleakage of chitosan nano hydrogel-incorporated mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) when used as a retrograde filling material. Materials and Methods: Sixty single-rooted premolars were decoronated at cemento enamel junction (CEJ), and root canals were prepared and obturated, with the coronal part sealed with a composite. The dye absorption was measured by an automatic spectrophotometer. Results: The results showed that the MTA + chitosan group had less microleakage values compared to the MTA group but was not statistically significant and GIC + chitosan had less microleakage values compared to the GIC group and was statistically significant. Conclusion: Chitosan-incorporated MTA and chitosan-incorporated GIC can be considered as retrograde filling material; however, further in vitro and in vivo research and long-term clinical studies are required.
format Article
id doaj-art-c34a628393134065b2774fb7fb84b781
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-c34a628393134065b2774fb7fb84b7812025-01-13T10:22:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3727S372910.4103/jpbs.jpbs_747_24To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling MaterialVinaykumar G. SuryavanshiRavi K. TaleVivekanand D. KolvekarRashmi ChordiyaP S AmalB AbijeetBackground: An inadequate apical seal stands out as a primary cause of disappointment in surgical endodontic procedures. Therefore, the choice of root-end filling material should aim to prevent the leakage of potential contaminants into the periapical tissue. Aim: To evaluate and compare microleakage of chitosan nano hydrogel-incorporated mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) when used as a retrograde filling material. Materials and Methods: Sixty single-rooted premolars were decoronated at cemento enamel junction (CEJ), and root canals were prepared and obturated, with the coronal part sealed with a composite. The dye absorption was measured by an automatic spectrophotometer. Results: The results showed that the MTA + chitosan group had less microleakage values compared to the MTA group but was not statistically significant and GIC + chitosan had less microleakage values compared to the GIC group and was statistically significant. Conclusion: Chitosan-incorporated MTA and chitosan-incorporated GIC can be considered as retrograde filling material; however, further in vitro and in vivo research and long-term clinical studies are required.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_747_24apical microleakagechitosangicmta
spellingShingle Vinaykumar G. Suryavanshi
Ravi K. Tale
Vivekanand D. Kolvekar
Rashmi Chordiya
P S Amal
B Abijeet
To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
apical microleakage
chitosan
gic
mta
title To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
title_full To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
title_fullStr To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
title_full_unstemmed To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
title_short To Evaluate and Compare the Microleakage of Chitosan Nano Hydrogel-Incorporated MTA and Glass Ionomer Cements When used as a Retrograde Filling Material
title_sort to evaluate and compare the microleakage of chitosan nano hydrogel incorporated mta and glass ionomer cements when used as a retrograde filling material
topic apical microleakage
chitosan
gic
mta
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_747_24
work_keys_str_mv AT vinaykumargsuryavanshi toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial
AT raviktale toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial
AT vivekananddkolvekar toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial
AT rashmichordiya toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial
AT psamal toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial
AT babijeet toevaluateandcomparethemicroleakageofchitosannanohydrogelincorporatedmtaandglassionomercementswhenusedasaretrogradefillingmaterial