Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)

One of the benchmarks and tools for investigating the elements of the art is "stylistics", in which the study of literary instruments and rhetorical elements in the language of poets is one of the most accurate and metric methods for the understanding and drawing of poetic images. This qua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei, SIAVASH HAGHJOU
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2020-05-01
Series:مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_4481_69cc04ef80c4d7ea331a7d3a87f8b3f8.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527781099307008
author Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei
SIAVASH HAGHJOU
author_facet Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei
SIAVASH HAGHJOU
author_sort Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei
collection DOAJ
description One of the benchmarks and tools for investigating the elements of the art is "stylistics", in which the study of literary instruments and rhetorical elements in the language of poets is one of the most accurate and metric methods for the understanding and drawing of poetic images. This quantitative-statistic based, first analyzes and compares two groups of single literary techniques (simile, poem, metaphor, metonymy, and amphibology) and combined Techniques (metonymy metaphor, metonymy amphibology metaphor, simile metonymy amphibology metaphor) in five hundred bits of two logical and ritualistic Masnavi (Mosibatnameh and Mantegh Al-teir) and then in the same amount of Rumi's MasnaviManavi and then analyzes them. The results of the research indicate the magnificent rhetoric of Mosibatnameh among the three Masnavi according to using the combined techniques. The amount of Rumi's usage of the single technique "metonymy" and "metaphorical" is so impressive that, taking into account the totality of dingle techniques, MasnaviManavi is better than the other two. But in the field of combined techniques, the MasnaviManavi has the lowest frequency, and it can be said that Rumi has little desire to take advantage of these techniques. However, in the combined section of single and combined techniques, it is considered to be at the higher level than the Mantegh Al-teir and at the lower level than Mosibatnameh. The Masnavi “Mantegh Al-Teir” in the single techniques section is the least-productive work and is lower than the other two works, and it is considered to be at the higher level than the MasnaviManavi and at the lower level than Mosibatnameh. But in the total number of single and combined techniques, it is lower than two other masnavi.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2d81ac1d9f34a6eb0bb40041672a94c
institution Kabale University
issn 2008-9570
2717-090X
language fas
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
spelling doaj-art-c2d81ac1d9f34a6eb0bb40041672a94c2025-01-15T08:10:23ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات زبانی و بلاغی2008-95702717-090X2020-05-01112138741410.22075/jlrs.2019.13201.11524481Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei0SIAVASH HAGHJOU1Mazandaran UniversityMazandaran UniversityOne of the benchmarks and tools for investigating the elements of the art is "stylistics", in which the study of literary instruments and rhetorical elements in the language of poets is one of the most accurate and metric methods for the understanding and drawing of poetic images. This quantitative-statistic based, first analyzes and compares two groups of single literary techniques (simile, poem, metaphor, metonymy, and amphibology) and combined Techniques (metonymy metaphor, metonymy amphibology metaphor, simile metonymy amphibology metaphor) in five hundred bits of two logical and ritualistic Masnavi (Mosibatnameh and Mantegh Al-teir) and then in the same amount of Rumi's MasnaviManavi and then analyzes them. The results of the research indicate the magnificent rhetoric of Mosibatnameh among the three Masnavi according to using the combined techniques. The amount of Rumi's usage of the single technique "metonymy" and "metaphorical" is so impressive that, taking into account the totality of dingle techniques, MasnaviManavi is better than the other two. But in the field of combined techniques, the MasnaviManavi has the lowest frequency, and it can be said that Rumi has little desire to take advantage of these techniques. However, in the combined section of single and combined techniques, it is considered to be at the higher level than the Mantegh Al-teir and at the lower level than Mosibatnameh. The Masnavi “Mantegh Al-Teir” in the single techniques section is the least-productive work and is lower than the other two works, and it is considered to be at the higher level than the MasnaviManavi and at the lower level than Mosibatnameh. But in the total number of single and combined techniques, it is lower than two other masnavi.https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_4481_69cc04ef80c4d7ea331a7d3a87f8b3f8.pdfstylesingle literary techniquescombined techniques
spellingShingle Mostafa Mirdar Rezaei
SIAVASH HAGHJOU
Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
style
single literary techniques
combined techniques
title Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
title_full Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
title_fullStr Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
title_full_unstemmed Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
title_short Stylistics Comparison between MosibatNameh and Mantegh Al-teir of Attar and MasnaviManavi (Case Study: Poetry techniques)
title_sort stylistics comparison between mosibatnameh and mantegh al teir of attar and masnavimanavi case study poetry techniques
topic style
single literary techniques
combined techniques
url https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_4481_69cc04ef80c4d7ea331a7d3a87f8b3f8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafamirdarrezaei stylisticscomparisonbetweenmosibatnamehandmanteghalteirofattarandmasnavimanavicasestudypoetrytechniques
AT siavashhaghjou stylisticscomparisonbetweenmosibatnamehandmanteghalteirofattarandmasnavimanavicasestudypoetrytechniques