Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice
Abstract Background Application of standard infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is crucial to prevent hospital-acquired infections, but compliance by physicians is suboptimal. Interventions aimed to improve compliance are often generic and lack sustained effects. A better understanding o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01572-z |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849309755693072384 |
|---|---|
| author | Miriam Schutte Mireille Dekker Jonne Sikkens Rosa van Mansfeld |
| author_facet | Miriam Schutte Mireille Dekker Jonne Sikkens Rosa van Mansfeld |
| author_sort | Miriam Schutte |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Application of standard infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is crucial to prevent hospital-acquired infections, but compliance by physicians is suboptimal. Interventions aimed to improve compliance are often generic and lack sustained effects. A better understanding of physicians’ trade-offs regarding application of IPC and influences on their behavior is needed to develop effective behavior change interventions. We aimed to understand physicians’ decision-making processes around application of IPC and the factors that influence their behavior. Methods This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 18 physicians and 7 nurses from five different hospitals in the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis involved inductive coding followed by deductive analysis using mechanisms of action, including the Theoretical Domains Framework, that link to behavior change techniques. Results We found heterogeneity in physicians’ approaches to decision-making around application of IPC. Some physicians relied on heuristics, while others applied logical reasoning. The latter group made an autonomous assessment of the risks for infection associated with a situation and traded off the costs and benefits of IPC application. The decision was further influenced by personal beliefs about the value of IPC and a supporting physical and social environment. Eighteen out of 26 mechanisms of action underlying the influences on IPC behavior were matched to our results; most important are “memory, attention and decision processes”, “behavioral cueing”, “beliefs about consequences”, “values”, “norms”, “social influences”, “social learning/imitation” and “environmental context and resources”. These findings suggest that interventions are most likely to be beneficial if these focus on developing heuristics, changing risk beliefs, using social norms and imitation and generating a supportive environment. Conclusion The heterogeneity in physicians’ decision-making and autonomous risk assessment which is different from other healthcare professionals calls for tailored interventions targeting heuristic decision making, personal beliefs, social norms and the environmental context. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c2c35a99e1fc4c5ea0036bcdec7270f8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2047-2994 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control |
| spelling | doaj-art-c2c35a99e1fc4c5ea0036bcdec7270f82025-08-20T03:53:58ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942025-05-0114111010.1186/s13756-025-01572-zBetween heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practiceMiriam Schutte0Mireille Dekker1Jonne Sikkens2Rosa van Mansfeld3Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of CareAmsterdam Institute for Infection and ImmunityDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAbstract Background Application of standard infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is crucial to prevent hospital-acquired infections, but compliance by physicians is suboptimal. Interventions aimed to improve compliance are often generic and lack sustained effects. A better understanding of physicians’ trade-offs regarding application of IPC and influences on their behavior is needed to develop effective behavior change interventions. We aimed to understand physicians’ decision-making processes around application of IPC and the factors that influence their behavior. Methods This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 18 physicians and 7 nurses from five different hospitals in the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis involved inductive coding followed by deductive analysis using mechanisms of action, including the Theoretical Domains Framework, that link to behavior change techniques. Results We found heterogeneity in physicians’ approaches to decision-making around application of IPC. Some physicians relied on heuristics, while others applied logical reasoning. The latter group made an autonomous assessment of the risks for infection associated with a situation and traded off the costs and benefits of IPC application. The decision was further influenced by personal beliefs about the value of IPC and a supporting physical and social environment. Eighteen out of 26 mechanisms of action underlying the influences on IPC behavior were matched to our results; most important are “memory, attention and decision processes”, “behavioral cueing”, “beliefs about consequences”, “values”, “norms”, “social influences”, “social learning/imitation” and “environmental context and resources”. These findings suggest that interventions are most likely to be beneficial if these focus on developing heuristics, changing risk beliefs, using social norms and imitation and generating a supportive environment. Conclusion The heterogeneity in physicians’ decision-making and autonomous risk assessment which is different from other healthcare professionals calls for tailored interventions targeting heuristic decision making, personal beliefs, social norms and the environmental context.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01572-zPhysiciansInfection preventionDecision-makingInterviewsBehaviorTheoretical domains framework |
| spellingShingle | Miriam Schutte Mireille Dekker Jonne Sikkens Rosa van Mansfeld Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Physicians Infection prevention Decision-making Interviews Behavior Theoretical domains framework |
| title | Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice |
| title_full | Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice |
| title_fullStr | Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice |
| title_short | Between heuristic and deliberative thinking: a multi-center qualitative study of physicians’ decision-making in infection prevention practice |
| title_sort | between heuristic and deliberative thinking a multi center qualitative study of physicians decision making in infection prevention practice |
| topic | Physicians Infection prevention Decision-making Interviews Behavior Theoretical domains framework |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01572-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT miriamschutte betweenheuristicanddeliberativethinkingamulticenterqualitativestudyofphysiciansdecisionmakingininfectionpreventionpractice AT mireilledekker betweenheuristicanddeliberativethinkingamulticenterqualitativestudyofphysiciansdecisionmakingininfectionpreventionpractice AT jonnesikkens betweenheuristicanddeliberativethinkingamulticenterqualitativestudyofphysiciansdecisionmakingininfectionpreventionpractice AT rosavanmansfeld betweenheuristicanddeliberativethinkingamulticenterqualitativestudyofphysiciansdecisionmakingininfectionpreventionpractice |