Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility

Electromobility is generally seen as an efficient means of decarbonizing the transport sector. Ensuring both a broad propagation of electric vehicles and a stable energy system requires intelligent charging strategies in the form of use cases. Most use cases do not combine both the prospect of profi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Vollmuth, Maximilian Hampel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2424
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544092202303488
author Patrick Vollmuth
Maximilian Hampel
author_facet Patrick Vollmuth
Maximilian Hampel
author_sort Patrick Vollmuth
collection DOAJ
description Electromobility is generally seen as an efficient means of decarbonizing the transport sector. Ensuring both a broad propagation of electric vehicles and a stable energy system requires intelligent charging strategies in the form of use cases. Most use cases do not combine both the prospect of profit and systemic advantages. This paper analyzes combinations of use cases that merge different use cases to combine profitability and systemic benefits. We present a novel methodological approach for analyzing and comparing the synergies of different use case combinations. The focus is on evaluating the potential for reducing the technical implementation effort resulting from the simultaneous implementation of two to three different use cases. Our findings show that the simultaneous implementation of complex use cases, often involving in-front-of-meter pooling of vehicles, produces the greatest synergies. Combinations that include ancillary services and spot market trading lead to considerable reductions in the implementation effort. Balancing profitability and systemic benefits with little absolute effort requires combinations that include use cases implemented behind-the-meter, for example, optimization of self-consumption. Challenges in the implementation of the combinations investigated arise primarily from technical hurdles and the fact that some use cases have not yet been fully defined in regulatory terms.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1ec03058f11449cab016d4e90ce2ed9
institution Kabale University
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-c1ec03058f11449cab016d4e90ce2ed92025-01-13T00:59:27ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-03-01165242410.3390/en16052424Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-MobilityPatrick Vollmuth0Maximilian Hampel1FfE (Forschungsgesellschaft für Energiewirtschaft mbH), 80995 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Energy and Process Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, GermanyElectromobility is generally seen as an efficient means of decarbonizing the transport sector. Ensuring both a broad propagation of electric vehicles and a stable energy system requires intelligent charging strategies in the form of use cases. Most use cases do not combine both the prospect of profit and systemic advantages. This paper analyzes combinations of use cases that merge different use cases to combine profitability and systemic benefits. We present a novel methodological approach for analyzing and comparing the synergies of different use case combinations. The focus is on evaluating the potential for reducing the technical implementation effort resulting from the simultaneous implementation of two to three different use cases. Our findings show that the simultaneous implementation of complex use cases, often involving in-front-of-meter pooling of vehicles, produces the greatest synergies. Combinations that include ancillary services and spot market trading lead to considerable reductions in the implementation effort. Balancing profitability and systemic benefits with little absolute effort requires combinations that include use cases implemented behind-the-meter, for example, optimization of self-consumption. Challenges in the implementation of the combinations investigated arise primarily from technical hurdles and the fact that some use cases have not yet been fully defined in regulatory terms.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2424intelligent chargingimplementation effortaggregatorspot market tradingancillary serviceoperating reserve
spellingShingle Patrick Vollmuth
Maximilian Hampel
Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
Energies
intelligent charging
implementation effort
aggregator
spot market trading
ancillary service
operating reserve
title Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
title_full Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
title_fullStr Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
title_full_unstemmed Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
title_short Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility
title_sort synergies of electric vehicle multi use analyzing the implementation effort for use case combinations in smart e mobility
topic intelligent charging
implementation effort
aggregator
spot market trading
ancillary service
operating reserve
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2424
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickvollmuth synergiesofelectricvehiclemultiuseanalyzingtheimplementationeffortforusecasecombinationsinsmartemobility
AT maximilianhampel synergiesofelectricvehiclemultiuseanalyzingtheimplementationeffortforusecasecombinationsinsmartemobility