Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Purpose To comprehensively compare the surgical outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with traditional endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR) using systematic review methods, evaluating the efficacy and safety of rVHR and providing reference for clinical applications of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junfeng Li, Shihong Li, Lunwu Wei, Huiping Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02997-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849335027521814528
author Junfeng Li
Shihong Li
Lunwu Wei
Huiping Li
author_facet Junfeng Li
Shihong Li
Lunwu Wei
Huiping Li
author_sort Junfeng Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To comprehensively compare the surgical outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with traditional endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR) using systematic review methods, evaluating the efficacy and safety of rVHR and providing reference for clinical applications of rVHR. Methods This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) list. The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane library, Embase, Scopus, and SpringerLink. The retrieval period spanned from the inception of database until 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes of recurrence, re-hernioplasty, operative time, length of hospital stay and surgical site occurrence were compared between rVHR and lapVHR. Results A total of 5 studies (237 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with lapVHR, the treatment of rVHR significantly decreased re-hernioplasty (RR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.66). Additionally, rVHR significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (MD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.71) and operative time (MD = 69.45, 95%CI: 45.76, 93.14). In addition, rVHR can reduce the recurrence rate, but it is a marginal statistical difference (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.13). Conclusion Overall, both rVHR and lapVHR were effective and safe. Nevertheless, rVHR shows superiority in terms of recurrence rate and re-hernioplasty rate. More high-quality studies are warranted to validate the results of this study.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1de3d987ef54ab29e96ec3dbbd7f738
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2482
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj-art-c1de3d987ef54ab29e96ec3dbbd7f7382025-08-20T03:45:24ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822025-07-0125111010.1186/s12893-025-02997-4Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJunfeng Li0Shihong Li1Lunwu Wei2Huiping Li3Department of General Surgery, Jiangyou second People’s hospitalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third People’s Hospital of ChengduDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Jiangyou second People’s hospitalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical CollegeAbstract Purpose To comprehensively compare the surgical outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with traditional endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR) using systematic review methods, evaluating the efficacy and safety of rVHR and providing reference for clinical applications of rVHR. Methods This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) list. The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane library, Embase, Scopus, and SpringerLink. The retrieval period spanned from the inception of database until 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes of recurrence, re-hernioplasty, operative time, length of hospital stay and surgical site occurrence were compared between rVHR and lapVHR. Results A total of 5 studies (237 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with lapVHR, the treatment of rVHR significantly decreased re-hernioplasty (RR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.66). Additionally, rVHR significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (MD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.71) and operative time (MD = 69.45, 95%CI: 45.76, 93.14). In addition, rVHR can reduce the recurrence rate, but it is a marginal statistical difference (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.13). Conclusion Overall, both rVHR and lapVHR were effective and safe. Nevertheless, rVHR shows superiority in terms of recurrence rate and re-hernioplasty rate. More high-quality studies are warranted to validate the results of this study.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02997-4Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR)Endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR)Systematic reviewMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Junfeng Li
Shihong Li
Lunwu Wei
Huiping Li
Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMC Surgery
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR)
Endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR)
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of robot assisted versus endo laparoscopic ventral hernia repair a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR)
Endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (lapVHR)
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02997-4
work_keys_str_mv AT junfengli efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusendolaparoscopicventralherniarepairametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shihongli efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusendolaparoscopicventralherniarepairametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lunwuwei efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusendolaparoscopicventralherniarepairametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huipingli efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusendolaparoscopicventralherniarepairametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials