APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS

An objective assessment of the severity of the patient's condition allows for a comparative study of their results and, equally important, a more objective prediction of treatment outcomes. In our work, we use several scales to assess the severity of patients with advanced purulent peritonitis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ярослав Миронович Лещишин, Андрей Игоревич Баранов, Константин Владимирович Потехин, Сергей Александрович Ярощук, Юрий Викторович Валуйских
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: The Publishing House Medicine and Enlightenment 2020-06-01
Series:Медицина в Кузбассе
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mednauki.ru/index.php/MK/article/view/459
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849249267781206016
author Ярослав Миронович Лещишин
Андрей Игоревич Баранов
Константин Владимирович Потехин
Сергей Александрович Ярощук
Юрий Викторович Валуйских
author_facet Ярослав Миронович Лещишин
Андрей Игоревич Баранов
Константин Владимирович Потехин
Сергей Александрович Ярощук
Юрий Викторович Валуйских
author_sort Ярослав Миронович Лещишин
collection DOAJ
description An objective assessment of the severity of the patient's condition allows for a comparative study of their results and, equally important, a more objective prediction of treatment outcomes. In our work, we use several scales to assess the severity of patients with advanced purulent peritonitis and predict the mortality of patients in the sample, these are SAPSII, SOFA, MODS and MPI. Aim – compare the prognostic value of the above scales in patients with advanced purulent peritonitis. Materials and methods. We studied the medical records of patients who were treated with the diagnosis: common purulent peritonitis in the period from 2013 to 2018. A retrospective analysis of the severity of patients condition was performed using the SAPSII, SOFA, MODS scale and the Mannheim peritonitis index (MIP). According to the selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, 184 cases histories were selected. The gender distribution is 90 mans (48.9 %) and 94 females (51.1 %). The median age is 63 years (25% – 52, 75% – 75). Statistical processing included methods of nonparametric statistics and ROC analysis. Results. The median score of the MIP scale for all patients in the sample was 26 (21; 30) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 23 (17; 26) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 30 (26; 34) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 7.4; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with an increase in MIP scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 42.4; p < 0.001). The median score of the SAPSII scale for all patients in the sample was 32 (21; 52) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 26 (18; 33) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 57 (48; 71) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 9.6; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with increasing SAPSII scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 95.9; p < 0.001). The median score of the SOFA scale for all patients in the sample was 4 (2; 7) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 2 (1; 4) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 8 (5; 11) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 8.0; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with increasing scores on the SOFA scale is statistically significant (χ2CA = 74.9; p < 0.001). The median score of the MODS scale for all patients in the sample was 3 (1; 5) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 1 (0; 3) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 6 (4; 8) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 8.2; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase lethality with increasing MODS scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 59.5; p < 0.001). All scales have a statistically significant predictive ability (p<0.001 for the Mann-Whitney test). When predicting mortality for a specific patient, the SAPSII scale has the best predictive ability, the overall accuracy of the forecast was 90 %, 85 % of cases with a fatal outcome and 94 % of cases with a favorable outcome were correctly predicted, the AUROC indicator is 0.94. The accuracy of the forecast for the rest of the scales are of the order of 79-81 %. Conclusion. Thus, the use of integral scales in assessing the severity of patients with widespread purulent peritonitis is justified. Collecting the necessary data to assess the severity of the condition is available in almost any hospital providing emergency surgical care and allows you to statistically reliably predict the outcome of the disease.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf23f14f4dc441d19f28b7818c34da44
institution Kabale University
issn 1819-0901
2588-0411
language Russian
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher The Publishing House Medicine and Enlightenment
record_format Article
series Медицина в Кузбассе
spelling doaj-art-bf23f14f4dc441d19f28b7818c34da442025-08-20T03:57:39ZrusThe Publishing House Medicine and EnlightenmentМедицина в Кузбассе1819-09012588-04112020-06-011922027412APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITISЯрослав Миронович Лещишин0Андрей Игоревич Баранов1Константин Владимирович Потехин2Сергей Александрович Ярощук3Юрий Викторович Валуйских4Новокузнецкая городская клиническая больница №1НГИУВ – филиал ФГБОУ ДПО РМАНПО Минздрава России, г. НовокузнецкГБУЗ КО НГКБ № 22, г. НовокузнецкГБУЗ КО НГКБ № 29, г. НовокузнецкНГИУВ – филиал ФГБОУ ДПО РМАНПО Минздрава России, г. НовокузнецкAn objective assessment of the severity of the patient's condition allows for a comparative study of their results and, equally important, a more objective prediction of treatment outcomes. In our work, we use several scales to assess the severity of patients with advanced purulent peritonitis and predict the mortality of patients in the sample, these are SAPSII, SOFA, MODS and MPI. Aim – compare the prognostic value of the above scales in patients with advanced purulent peritonitis. Materials and methods. We studied the medical records of patients who were treated with the diagnosis: common purulent peritonitis in the period from 2013 to 2018. A retrospective analysis of the severity of patients condition was performed using the SAPSII, SOFA, MODS scale and the Mannheim peritonitis index (MIP). According to the selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, 184 cases histories were selected. The gender distribution is 90 mans (48.9 %) and 94 females (51.1 %). The median age is 63 years (25% – 52, 75% – 75). Statistical processing included methods of nonparametric statistics and ROC analysis. Results. The median score of the MIP scale for all patients in the sample was 26 (21; 30) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 23 (17; 26) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 30 (26; 34) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 7.4; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with an increase in MIP scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 42.4; p < 0.001). The median score of the SAPSII scale for all patients in the sample was 32 (21; 52) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 26 (18; 33) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 57 (48; 71) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 9.6; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with increasing SAPSII scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 95.9; p < 0.001). The median score of the SOFA scale for all patients in the sample was 4 (2; 7) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 2 (1; 4) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 8 (5; 11) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 8.0; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase mortality with increasing scores on the SOFA scale is statistically significant (χ2CA = 74.9; p < 0.001). The median score of the MODS scale for all patients in the sample was 3 (1; 5) points, in the group of patients with a favorable outcome it was 1 (0; 3) points, in the group of patients with a fatal outcome – 6 (4; 8) points, the differences are statistically significant (U = 8.2; p < 0.001). The tendency to increase lethality with increasing MODS scores is statistically significant (χ2CA = 59.5; p < 0.001). All scales have a statistically significant predictive ability (p<0.001 for the Mann-Whitney test). When predicting mortality for a specific patient, the SAPSII scale has the best predictive ability, the overall accuracy of the forecast was 90 %, 85 % of cases with a fatal outcome and 94 % of cases with a favorable outcome were correctly predicted, the AUROC indicator is 0.94. The accuracy of the forecast for the rest of the scales are of the order of 79-81 %. Conclusion. Thus, the use of integral scales in assessing the severity of patients with widespread purulent peritonitis is justified. Collecting the necessary data to assess the severity of the condition is available in almost any hospital providing emergency surgical care and allows you to statistically reliably predict the outcome of the disease.http://mednauki.ru/index.php/MK/article/view/459распространенный гнойный перитонитмангеймский индекс перитонитаинтегральные шкалы при перитоните
spellingShingle Ярослав Миронович Лещишин
Андрей Игоревич Баранов
Константин Владимирович Потехин
Сергей Александрович Ярощук
Юрий Викторович Валуйских
APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
Медицина в Кузбассе
распространенный гнойный перитонит
мангеймский индекс перитонита
интегральные шкалы при перитоните
title APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
title_full APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
title_fullStr APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
title_full_unstemmed APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
title_short APPLICATION OF INTEGRAL EVALUATION SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH WIDESPREAD PURULENT PERITONITIS
title_sort application of integral evaluation scales in patients with widespread purulent peritonitis
topic распространенный гнойный перитонит
мангеймский индекс перитонита
интегральные шкалы при перитоните
url http://mednauki.ru/index.php/MK/article/view/459
work_keys_str_mv AT âroslavmironovičleŝišin applicationofintegralevaluationscalesinpatientswithwidespreadpurulentperitonitis
AT andrejigorevičbaranov applicationofintegralevaluationscalesinpatientswithwidespreadpurulentperitonitis
AT konstantinvladimirovičpotehin applicationofintegralevaluationscalesinpatientswithwidespreadpurulentperitonitis
AT sergejaleksandrovičâroŝuk applicationofintegralevaluationscalesinpatientswithwidespreadpurulentperitonitis
AT ûrijviktorovičvalujskih applicationofintegralevaluationscalesinpatientswithwidespreadpurulentperitonitis