Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the potential impacts of the introduction of a smoke-free generation (SFG) policy in Canada with a perpetual ban on cigarette sales to anyone born after 2009 instigated on 1 January 2025. MethodsAn existing Canadian mode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Doug Coyle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Health Agency of Canada 2025-01-01
Series:Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada
Online Access:https://canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-45-no-1-2025/implementing-smoke-free-generation-estimates-impacts.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526675801636864
author Doug Coyle
author_facet Doug Coyle
author_sort Doug Coyle
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the potential impacts of the introduction of a smoke-free generation (SFG) policy in Canada with a perpetual ban on cigarette sales to anyone born after 2009 instigated on 1 January 2025. MethodsAn existing Canadian model relating to smoking cessation was adapted and augmented to assess the impact of an SFG policy on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life expectancy, health care costs, smoking-related taxes, and Canadian tobacco industry gross domestic product (GDP). The cumulative impact of the policy for the entire Canadian population was assessed for time horizons up to 90 years with an annual discount rate of 1.5%. ResultsAfter 50 years, this SFG policy would lead to 476 814 more QALYs, $2.3 billion less in health care costs, $7.4 billion less in smoking-related taxes and a $3.1 billion reduction in tobacco industry GDP. The combined value of health benefits gained and health care costs averted would exceed the sum of tax revenues foregone and reduced GDP, if the value of a QALY was at least $17 147. Use of higher discount rates and inclusion of unrelated health care costs had little impact on the interpretation of the results. ConclusionThe implementation of an SFG policy will bring substantive health benefits to the population in Canada. Although health care cost savings are lower than the combination of lost tax revenues and the decline in the GDP from the Canadian tobacco industry, the value of the health benefits realized outweigh the negative offsets.
format Article
id doaj-art-bdbc312e6f1c4aaaa1a44844cd81eb73
institution Kabale University
issn 2368-738X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Health Agency of Canada
record_format Article
series Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada
spelling doaj-art-bdbc312e6f1c4aaaa1a44844cd81eb732025-01-16T14:01:19ZengPublic Health Agency of CanadaHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada2368-738X2025-01-01451395310.24095/hpcdp.45.1.03Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impactsDoug Coyle0School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the potential impacts of the introduction of a smoke-free generation (SFG) policy in Canada with a perpetual ban on cigarette sales to anyone born after 2009 instigated on 1 January 2025. MethodsAn existing Canadian model relating to smoking cessation was adapted and augmented to assess the impact of an SFG policy on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life expectancy, health care costs, smoking-related taxes, and Canadian tobacco industry gross domestic product (GDP). The cumulative impact of the policy for the entire Canadian population was assessed for time horizons up to 90 years with an annual discount rate of 1.5%. ResultsAfter 50 years, this SFG policy would lead to 476 814 more QALYs, $2.3 billion less in health care costs, $7.4 billion less in smoking-related taxes and a $3.1 billion reduction in tobacco industry GDP. The combined value of health benefits gained and health care costs averted would exceed the sum of tax revenues foregone and reduced GDP, if the value of a QALY was at least $17 147. Use of higher discount rates and inclusion of unrelated health care costs had little impact on the interpretation of the results. ConclusionThe implementation of an SFG policy will bring substantive health benefits to the population in Canada. Although health care cost savings are lower than the combination of lost tax revenues and the decline in the GDP from the Canadian tobacco industry, the value of the health benefits realized outweigh the negative offsets.https://canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-45-no-1-2025/implementing-smoke-free-generation-estimates-impacts.html
spellingShingle Doug Coyle
Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada
title Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
title_full Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
title_fullStr Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
title_short Implementing a smoke-free generation policy for Canada: estimates of the long-term impacts
title_sort implementing a smoke free generation policy for canada estimates of the long term impacts
url https://canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-45-no-1-2025/implementing-smoke-free-generation-estimates-impacts.html
work_keys_str_mv AT dougcoyle implementingasmokefreegenerationpolicyforcanadaestimatesofthelongtermimpacts