Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.

With the development of network and simulation technology, virtual laboratories have been widely popularized in engineering education. However, few studies have systematically analyzed and summarized the impact of virtual labs on the effectiveness of engineering education. This study aims to conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiaxing Li, Wenhong Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841533117524869120
author Jiaxing Li
Wenhong Liang
author_facet Jiaxing Li
Wenhong Liang
author_sort Jiaxing Li
collection DOAJ
description With the development of network and simulation technology, virtual laboratories have been widely popularized in engineering education. However, few studies have systematically analyzed and summarized the impact of virtual labs on the effectiveness of engineering education. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of published data on the impact of virtual laboratories on engineering students' performance. A total of 709 peer-reviewed publications on this topic were gathered from Web of Science and Scopus, and after strict inclusion criteria were applied, 46 studies from 22 publications were included in this meta-analysis. These studies were controlled experiments and pre-post designs with virtual labs as the intervention, reporting necessary descriptive summary statistics such as mean score comparisons and standard deviations of the two comparison groups. The results indicate that virtual laboratories are a significant predictor of engineering education outcomes, with an effect size (Hedges' g) of 0.686 (95% CI 0.414-0.959). Among these, the effect sizes for "learning motivation" and "learning engagement" are the highest across all types of results, at 3.571 (95% CI 3.042-4.099) and 2.888 (95% CI 2.419-3.357), respectively; this suggests that virtual labs are a key factor in motivating engineering students to engage in learning activities and pursue knowledge and skills. The results show that virtual labs currently lack the ability to completely replace hands-on labs in engineering education. However, they can inspire student motivation and engagement and compensate for the shortcomings of traditional lab facilities. Virtual labs have become an indispensable auxiliary tool in engineering experimental teaching. Therefore, consciously integrating virtual labs with physical experiences is a direction for sustainably developing engineering education in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb7bcbecc0254fcdaa7b98956adc1ae2
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-bb7bcbecc0254fcdaa7b98956adc1ae22025-01-17T05:31:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031626910.1371/journal.pone.0316269Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.Jiaxing LiWenhong LiangWith the development of network and simulation technology, virtual laboratories have been widely popularized in engineering education. However, few studies have systematically analyzed and summarized the impact of virtual labs on the effectiveness of engineering education. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of published data on the impact of virtual laboratories on engineering students' performance. A total of 709 peer-reviewed publications on this topic were gathered from Web of Science and Scopus, and after strict inclusion criteria were applied, 46 studies from 22 publications were included in this meta-analysis. These studies were controlled experiments and pre-post designs with virtual labs as the intervention, reporting necessary descriptive summary statistics such as mean score comparisons and standard deviations of the two comparison groups. The results indicate that virtual laboratories are a significant predictor of engineering education outcomes, with an effect size (Hedges' g) of 0.686 (95% CI 0.414-0.959). Among these, the effect sizes for "learning motivation" and "learning engagement" are the highest across all types of results, at 3.571 (95% CI 3.042-4.099) and 2.888 (95% CI 2.419-3.357), respectively; this suggests that virtual labs are a key factor in motivating engineering students to engage in learning activities and pursue knowledge and skills. The results show that virtual labs currently lack the ability to completely replace hands-on labs in engineering education. However, they can inspire student motivation and engagement and compensate for the shortcomings of traditional lab facilities. Virtual labs have become an indispensable auxiliary tool in engineering experimental teaching. Therefore, consciously integrating virtual labs with physical experiences is a direction for sustainably developing engineering education in the future.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
spellingShingle Jiaxing Li
Wenhong Liang
Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
title_full Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
title_short Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis.
title_sort effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education a meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaxingli effectivenessofvirtuallaboratoryinengineeringeducationametaanalysis
AT wenhongliang effectivenessofvirtuallaboratoryinengineeringeducationametaanalysis