Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction

This study seeks to answer this question that the variations of muscle length or joint angular can change the rate of coactivation of antagonist muscle in isometric contraction? The subjects were 15 male students with average age 21.67-1.58, height 172.93+5.13an and weight 60.85±5.41kg All subjects...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: فریبرز هوانلو, مجتبی صالح پور, سید علی حسینی, سیروس شیخی
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Shahid Beheshti University 2014-04-01
Series:فیزیولوژی ورزش و فعالیت بدنی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://joeppa.sbu.ac.ir/article_98685_2a6a6a3a805dccdab0ce21a07c75e5ec.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846167281426497536
author فریبرز هوانلو
مجتبی صالح پور
سید علی حسینی
سیروس شیخی
author_facet فریبرز هوانلو
مجتبی صالح پور
سید علی حسینی
سیروس شیخی
author_sort فریبرز هوانلو
collection DOAJ
description This study seeks to answer this question that the variations of muscle length or joint angular can change the rate of coactivation of antagonist muscle in isometric contraction? The subjects were 15 male students with average age 21.67-1.58, height 172.93+5.13an and weight 60.85±5.41kg All subjects were healthy and had no any history of pain or injury in arm, elbow and wrist. IEMG were taken from biceps and triceps with maximal voluntary contraction in 90-120 and 180 degree of elbow joint. Results showed that maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90° and 120° angle (P-0.001) were significantly increased in comparison with 180°. Whereas there were no significant difference between maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90° and 120° angle (P-0.516).The electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90° (P=0.010) and 120° (P=0.002) were significantly greater than 180° (P=0.043). Also there were no significant difference between electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90° (P-0.819) and 120° (P-0.202). Results indicate that other factors except joint angel would affect the research outcomes. Some researchers report differences in muscles recruitment patterns due to velocity of movement, amount and type of muscle work and force production. Joint angel has the most effect than other factors such as movement velocity. So Joint angel as a prominent factor in control of recruitment patterns of muscles should be noticed. It is important that when bodybuildings coach's sports teams want strengthen a particular muscle with respect to its importance in moving a given motion in a particular sport, that in this case to put the muscle at greatest burden, surrounding muscle and joint angles should be considered very carefully regulated.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba09c6892d884009a5da98a33f8ac5eb
institution Kabale University
issn 2676-3710
2645-4041
language fas
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher Shahid Beheshti University
record_format Article
series فیزیولوژی ورزش و فعالیت بدنی
spelling doaj-art-ba09c6892d884009a5da98a33f8ac5eb2024-11-15T04:06:45ZfasShahid Beheshti Universityفیزیولوژی ورزش و فعالیت بدنی2676-37102645-40412014-04-017110.48308/joeppa.2014.9868598685Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contractionفریبرز هوانلومجتبی صالح پورسید علی حسینیسیروس شیخیThis study seeks to answer this question that the variations of muscle length or joint angular can change the rate of coactivation of antagonist muscle in isometric contraction? The subjects were 15 male students with average age 21.67-1.58, height 172.93+5.13an and weight 60.85±5.41kg All subjects were healthy and had no any history of pain or injury in arm, elbow and wrist. IEMG were taken from biceps and triceps with maximal voluntary contraction in 90-120 and 180 degree of elbow joint. Results showed that maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90° and 120° angle (P-0.001) were significantly increased in comparison with 180°. Whereas there were no significant difference between maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90° and 120° angle (P-0.516).The electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90° (P=0.010) and 120° (P=0.002) were significantly greater than 180° (P=0.043). Also there were no significant difference between electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90° (P-0.819) and 120° (P-0.202). Results indicate that other factors except joint angel would affect the research outcomes. Some researchers report differences in muscles recruitment patterns due to velocity of movement, amount and type of muscle work and force production. Joint angel has the most effect than other factors such as movement velocity. So Joint angel as a prominent factor in control of recruitment patterns of muscles should be noticed. It is important that when bodybuildings coach's sports teams want strengthen a particular muscle with respect to its importance in moving a given motion in a particular sport, that in this case to put the muscle at greatest burden, surrounding muscle and joint angles should be considered very carefully regulated.https://joeppa.sbu.ac.ir/article_98685_2a6a6a3a805dccdab0ce21a07c75e5ec.pdfelectromyographyisokineticmaximal voluntary contractionjoint angles
spellingShingle فریبرز هوانلو
مجتبی صالح پور
سید علی حسینی
سیروس شیخی
Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
فیزیولوژی ورزش و فعالیت بدنی
electromyography
isokinetic
maximal voluntary contraction
joint angles
title Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
title_full Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
title_fullStr Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
title_full_unstemmed Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
title_short Investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co-activation in isometric contraction
title_sort investigation the change joint angle on antagonist muscle co activation in isometric contraction
topic electromyography
isokinetic
maximal voluntary contraction
joint angles
url https://joeppa.sbu.ac.ir/article_98685_2a6a6a3a805dccdab0ce21a07c75e5ec.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT frybrzhwạnlw investigationthechangejointangleonantagonistmusclecoactivationinisometriccontraction
AT mjtbyṣạlḥpwr investigationthechangejointangleonantagonistmusclecoactivationinisometriccontraction
AT sydʿlyḥsyny investigationthechangejointangleonantagonistmusclecoactivationinisometriccontraction
AT syrwssẖykẖy investigationthechangejointangleonantagonistmusclecoactivationinisometriccontraction